This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Fri Jan 26, 2007 7:05 pm
Here's what I've found so far:
-20 Jun 1965, MiG-17,
A-1 Skyraider, USS Midway, VA-25, LT Clinton B. Johnson and LTJG Charles W. Hartman III (shared victory)
- 9 Oct 1966, MiG-17,
A-1 Skyraider, USS Intrepid, VA-176 LTJG William T. Patton
this site details the encounter states that probalbility that 2 additional Mig 17s may have been downed.
http://skyraider.org/skyassn/sartapes/migkill/migkill.htm
Recording of VA-176 MiG Kill Debriefing Tape
http://skyraider.org/skyassn/sartapes/migkill/migkill.ram
Shay
____________
Semper Fortis
Fri Jan 26, 2007 7:45 pm
March 31, 1945, ME 262, Lt. Harrison "Bud" Tordoff, P-51D 44-72364 "UPUPA EPOPS", 353rd FG/352nd
On March 31, 1945, Upupa Epops was on a bomber escort mission high above Germany when it encountered a pair of 262s. Although the jets were faster than the P-51, Upupa Epops had an altitude advantage when it pounced. One 262 was hit by .50-caliber machine-gun fire from the P-51's six Brownings. After a short chase, its 262 pilot bailed out, and the jet spun in and crashed.
Shay
____________
Semper Fortis
Sat Jan 27, 2007 2:09 pm
I am away from home for a few days, but I have a print of late model Griffon engine Spitfires shotting down a Me 262. I think it says first jet kill. When I'm back I'll try to get the date and details.
Sat Jan 27, 2007 2:17 pm
Not quite a dogfight, but didn't the Brits use Tempests to chase down a few V-1 Buzz Bombs (technically a jet?)
Also, did any P-47s knock down and Me-262s? The T-bolts usually operated at low level by that point, and most 262 kills were done by catching them in the pattern.
SN
Sat Jan 27, 2007 3:48 pm
Canadian Flight Lieutenant John Garland (DFC) had four victories including a Me262. He was shot down by flak in Feb/45 and became a POW. He flew a Hawker Tempest.
Brian....
Sat Jan 27, 2007 4:29 pm
Thinking back on the print, I believe the pilot is Canadian, but it is definitely not a Tempest in this incident, there are several Spitfires, likely MKIXVs. I am pretty sure there is a date, perhaps 44 and the pilot's name. I'll be back by Tue and post on it then. When did the 262 go into acitve service?
Sat Jan 27, 2007 7:07 pm
Thanks Bill,
I’m not really sure about the details behind this kill and don’t know what aircraft he was flying at the time. Based on the dates I have it shows Garland as converting to Spits Aug/43 and the Tempest in Sept/44, his 262 kill date was shown as Dec 3/44 so assumed it was a Tempest. If you can shed some light on this, it’d be much appreciated.
Bill Greenwood wrote:When did the 262 go into acitve service?
Oct 3 1944 ?
BTW, doing a little searching on the subject, I found this website.
http://jpgleize.club.fr/aces/ww2jetk.htm
Brian…
Thu Feb 01, 2007 7:16 pm
Now here's one that I had not heard of:
Found here:
http://www.faqs.org/docs/air/avbtsv1.html
In 1966, one Mohawk reputedly shot down a North Vietnamese MiG-17 fighter with 70 millimeter unguided rockets. The North Vietnamese pilot made a pass at one of a pair of Mohawks, the other loosed a salvo of rockets at the fighter, and to the surprise of all, managed to hit the MiG. However, one Mohawk was shot down by a North Vietnamese MiG in 1969, evening the score. This was the only Army fixed-wing aircraft loss in air-to-air combat during the war.
Is this news to anyone else? Can anyone corroborate these events??
Shay
____________
Semper Fortis
Thu Feb 01, 2007 7:32 pm
Shay wrote:Now here's one that I had not heard of:
Found here:
http://www.faqs.org/docs/air/avbtsv1.htmlIn 1966, one Mohawk reputedly shot down a North Vietnamese MiG-17 fighter with 70 millimeter unguided rockets. The North Vietnamese pilot made a pass at one of a pair of Mohawks, the other loosed a salvo of rockets at the fighter, and to the surprise of all, managed to hit the MiG. However, one Mohawk was shot down by a North Vietnamese MiG in 1969, evening the score. This was the only Army fixed-wing aircraft loss in air-to-air combat during the war.
Is this news to anyone else? Can anyone corroborate these events??
Shay
____________
Semper Fortis
While the OV-1 Mohawk is a prop plane, it is turbine powered. The original question was "pistons vs. turbines".
I know, anal comment.
Thu Feb 01, 2007 7:42 pm
maxum96 wrote:While the OV-1 Mohawk is a prop plane, it is turbine powered. The original question was "pistons vs. turbines".
I know, anal comment.
Well seeing as I started the thread....I'm exercising "Author's Prerogative"
Shay
____________
Semper Fortis
Fri Feb 02, 2007 10:12 am
Shay, I am back home and looked at my print. THE LAST OF THE FEW by Frank Wotton. "Oct 5. 1944 Flt lt Headly Everhard draws first blood from a Me262" as other RCAF Spitfires close in. The jet has cannon holes in the tail, a few in the fuselage, and the right engine appears to be on fire. They are at low altitude with one Spit firing from 6 oclock high and two more off to the right side. The Spits look like MKIXs, but are painted without exact detail. They definetly have 2 cannon and 4 machine gun wiings. They don't look like XIVs, but could be; they certainly aren't Tempest.
Fri Feb 02, 2007 10:26 am
Sure enough,
on the website BLR gave is Hedley Everhard with one jet kill. Does anyone have more details on this?
Mon Feb 05, 2007 12:36 pm
Thanks for the headsup
Very nice painting, Frank was very talented.
Makes me wonder why this scenario played out the way it did? Was it a unexperienced pilot in the 262? Luck? Bad machinery on the part of the Schwalbe?
I wonder how the manueverability of the ME 262 compares to the Spit's
on a unrelated question Bill does your spit carry it's armorment? Or not to save weight?
Thanks
Shay
Mon Feb 05, 2007 12:43 pm
When it comes to a confrontation between a Prop versus Jet.
Is speed (or the lack of it) combined with manueverability the decideing factor? Of is it just plain luck?
To some extent I would the slower aircraft might have an advantage over the faster MIG. In being that the MIGs would transverse more airspace to turn around than a Propdriven aircraft would. Giving the prop pilot ample time to bring guns to bare.
I've always heard "Speed is Life..."
Obivioulsy this is not always the case.
Shay
____________
Semper Fortis
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.