Whooaa Jaldo, hold on to your panties … “off topic” you mean?
The subject of this thread is strictly about photographic abuse and copyright infringement, a dishonorable activity by all means.
Referring to the “other” matters that you mention is really “off topic” and not very mature on your part: the Museo del Aire and FAH 619 photo subject matters, may not be I am sure, of interest to any of the board members. I will soon learn to use Photoshop, but responsively and honestly (words which some people have difficulty understanding).
But it seems to me that you may have forgotten the fascinating story behind the photo of FAH 619, but again, nobody may be interested in the “message” then intended to you and your “colleague”, of course!!!
I know lots of interesting stories about people, particularly Hondurans, but it would be an irresponsibility of mine to discuss in this or in any other board. Besides, it is nobody's concern wouldn't you agree?
I have taken hundreds of photos, some of which you have abusively defaced by placing your stamp/logo/markings and publishing in your website without my permission (I have documental proof of two such cases).
Incidentally, have you read the Honduran copyright law No. 4-99-E, approved by National Congress and published January 15, 2000? I suspect you have not ... or perhaps you may have found possible loopholes in it?
In the past I've been harshly criticized for not posting my personal photos in the electronic media, but I have a very simple, powerful (and selfish if you like) reason for that: to avoid seeing them defaced (although I know you prefer to use the term “improved”) and with someone else’s markings and logos on them. They are mine and nobody else’s, unless I determine otherwise.
Most honest and law abiding persons I know, do not believe it is ethical to place marks, stamps or logos on photos of which they are not the rightful owners or the original photographers. Obtaining photos from the Internet is a wide-spread activity, which may be okay if you don’t use illegally. Same goes with photos from personal collections, websites, etc, but it does not give anyone the right to deface or publish with the Catrachowings (or any other) logo without permission. But then … there would be no such website!
About the FAH 614 photo recently published in this board, I am not sure you may have a written statement to the fact, although I am aware that a “Foto Molina” has never been registered as such, meaning it probably never existed … perhaps only in your imagination? But … if it “operated” without a registration and a valid permit, means it was illegal. Tell me more, will you (via PM)?
I offer you to discuss the “other” matters privately (PM, no insults please) if you like, but being aware of your rationale, I’m sure you will decide otherwise, because I will not further refer to this matter in the WIX board.
Personally I would prefer that on your next trip to Honduras we discuss about photographic abuse and copyright infringement matters at the court (where by the way, someone is very anxious to meet you – as I am – in person).
Amado
|