Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu May 15, 2025 7:20 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2020 9:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 12:26 am
Posts: 196
Location: Bryan Ohio
I was watching some video's on my RoKU of Hangar 10. I got to wondering if there are any BF-109's that are flyers with proven combat history? I know there are some P-51's and a handful of others that are flyers with proven combat history. But what of German Aircraft? I love a Merlin under power, but that Damler Benz under power has a mean growl. Thanks in advance for any feedback.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2020 10:06 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 1:05 am
Posts: 3236
I don't know if any of the Hispano Buchon, that were modified to Daimler Benz power, have a combat history.

Many of them fought in Spain's colonial wars, although I doubt their enemies had any aircraft, thus no air-to-air combat AFAIK

Saludos,


Tulio

_________________
Why take the best part of life out of your life, when you can have life with the best part of your life in your life?

I am one of them 'futbol' people.

Will the previous owner has pics of this double cabin sample

GOOD MORNING, WELCOME TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Press "1" for English.
Press "2" to disconnect until you have learned to speak English.


Sooooo, how am I going to know to press 1 or 2, if I do not speak English????


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2020 2:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 7:18 am
Posts: 671
Location: Berkshire, UK
Ed Likes wrote:
I got to wondering if there are any BF-109's that are flyers with proven combat history?


Two of them......that are potentially flyers, but are not currently flying.

FHC's Bf109-E3 has combat history, but all FHC's stuff appears to be grounded currently due to the virus impact on the museum.

The ex-Dave Price/ex-Ed Russell Bf109-E7 now at Biggin Hill in the UK was airworthy while in the USA, but has flown since coming back to the UK. That also has a combat history including being flown in combat during in the Battle of Britain by none other than Hans-Joachim Marseille.

As said, I don't think any of the DB engined Buchon conversions currently flying have any combat history?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2020 7:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 3:13 pm
Posts: 429
If you look at the development of the Hispano Aviación Buchon, the first flight of a Hispano engined one doesn't take place until 1945, and the Merlin engined one doesn't turn up until 1954. While 25 airframes were delivered from Germany to Spain, AFAIK no-one has ever been able to connect any German combat history to the Spanish airframes. I think it is pretty safe to state that any Buchon or Buchon conversion that is still around does not have a combat history.

So the only flying Bf/Me109s with combat history are the two E variants as mentioned above.

Always happy to be proven wrong of course... :D

_________________
A Little VC10derness - A Tribute to the Vickers VC10 - www.VC10.net


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2020 8:54 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 3:57 pm
Posts: 2333
Location: Minnesota
I would say that even the two rebuilt/flying Bf-109E's, mentioned in this thread, are not quite the combat-vets they're described to be, as there is so little to nothing of the originals contained within them. They're not too unlike/different than the Hangar 10 Bf-109G-6 either, which didn't start out as a Buchon like all of the other "G's" currently flying, but is essentially an all-new-build, based on a combat-vet wreck/identity. None of these have the amount of originality as say the Bf-109G-2 "Black 6" that flew in England up to 1997. There are a few more Bf-109E's under restoration in Europe, and another very close to flying (WkNr.1983), that also have original, combat-vet identities, but have very little to no original parts of the airframes they're claimed to be. One that should be quite original, however, when it is eventually completed/flying, is the Bf-109E WkNr.4034, under restoration by Guy Black in the UK, which is in fairly good condition, and very complete, and Guy Black has his mind set on using as much original parts of the airframe as possible, and other original Messerschmitt parts where needed, in the restoration, and will be trying to minimize the amount of new material that will need to be used. I know a lot of it couldn't be used, but the Bf-109G-6 nearing completion at Midwest Aero Restorations I believe has been able to retain some original parts, though of course much of the airframe had to be re-manufactured.

That said, the Collings P-40B is always described as being a Pearl Harbor vet, never anything else, even though I've heard it described that there are only 3 parts in the restored aircraft that came from the original it is claimed to be... so who's to say?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2020 9:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 7:18 am
Posts: 671
Location: Berkshire, UK
JohnTerrell wrote:
I would say that even the two rebuilt/flying Bf-109E's, mentioned in this thread, are not quite the combat-vets they're described to be, as there is so little to nothing of the originals contained within them. They're not too unlike/different than the Hangar 10 Bf-109G-6 either, which didn't start out as a Buchon like all of the other "G's" currently flying, but is essentially an all-new-build, based on a combat-vet wreck/identity. None of these have the amount of originality as say the Bf-109G-2 "Black 6" that flew in England up to 1997. There are a few more Bf-109E's under restoration in Europe, and another very close to flying (WkNr.1983), that also have original, combat-vet identities, but have very little to no original parts of the airframes they're claimed to be. One that should be quite original, however, when it is eventually completed/flying, is the Bf-109E WkNr.4034, under restoration by Guy Black in the UK, which is in fairly good condition, and very complete, and Guy Black has his mind set on using as much original parts of the airframe as possible, and other original Messerschmitt parts where needed, in the restoration, and will be trying to minimize the amount of new material that will need to be used.


Yeah, the remains of the FHC one were dug from the French beach into which it crashed, so a few corroded bits and the data plates.

The ex-Price/Russell one was quite complete when discovered IIRC, but wasn't the fuselage badly damaged during the rough recovery, or was that another one?

What has become of that complete yellow nose Emil that Jim Pearce found in a fresh water lake and was photographed after recovery pretty much intact and complete sitting on its u/c in a field...?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2020 12:03 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:19 pm
Posts: 1576
I think the only genuine combat veterans will be those firmly ground-bound in museums. The same probably applies to any Spitfire, Hurricane, P-51 or P-40. I can see both sides to the argument but meanwhile we risk destroying the worthy artifacts and populating the world with replicas.

Most folks seem to miss the point and assume that it's 'either/or', but why not place both versions on public display: a, "This is the real thing and this is what it looked like" type of thing.

The archaeological world already does this, and has learned far more about a looted shared heritage.

Not quite on-topic but I needed to express my despair.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2020 1:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:05 am
Posts: 271
Location: Oxfordshire
All of the restored original Bf109E's have a proven history.

1342 was a lump found in the sand dunes at Wissant but very little reused. JG51
3579 was a complete airframe recovered from a marsh. JG77/JG5
3235 was another complete example. This is the 'yellow nose' you are referring to. Lake recovery. JG5
1407 was another complete example. 3 identities. Lake recovery. JG77/JG5
1983 was a big lump found of airframe on the tundra. JG77/JG5

4034 BofB. Complete but stripped airframe. Recovered India. JG53

All were recovered after combat/operational loss so have a combat history.

_________________
'Coups De Foudre'
(511FS, 405FG watering hole), St Dizier, France 1944/45


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2020 3:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 11:31 am
Posts: 609
Location: A pool in Palm Springs
By the standards that we use determining combat history ANY SURVIVNG Me-109 from the E to the K has combat history. The factories themselves were being bombed from 1943 onward and all of these Surviving planes were assigned to squadrons. Even all Me-262’s I think have this in common....

That said documented history is difficult. We know it was there, just perhaps not exactly where. Restoration and resurrection are two different things however. Black 6 and the displays she flew were one of the few times enthusiasts got to see a real combat Vet 109 in the sky. A relic based reconstruction is a bit different, but there are really no originals about so it’s as close as we get. All of them are veterans of combat deployment I would say. Very few of them were unflown, and then transferred as new. Examples would be the Bv-155, Do335 or something like that. Even the NASM Ta-152 served with a combat unit, Jg-301 I think...


Last edited by Joe Scheil on Wed Oct 07, 2020 10:54 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2020 4:08 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 8:54 am
Posts: 3329
Archer wrote:
If you look at the development of the Hispano Aviación Buchon, the first flight of a Hispano engined one doesn't take place until 1945, and the Merlin engined one doesn't turn up until 1954. While 25 airframes were delivered from Germany to Spain, AFAIK no-one has ever been able to connect any German combat history to the Spanish airframes. I think it is pretty safe to state that any Buchon or Buchon conversion that is still around does not have a combat history.

So the only flying Bf/Me109s with combat history are the two E variants as mentioned above.

Always happy to be proven wrong of course... :D

Missing the point entirely. Combat history doesn’t stop in 1945. As Tulio mentioned, Buchons served operationally in North Africa with the Spanish Air Force.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2020 5:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 7:56 am
Posts: 843
The Bf-109G-6 at the Australian War Memorial is completely original including much of it's paint and is a combat vet.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2020 5:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 7:18 am
Posts: 671
Location: Berkshire, UK
Invader26 wrote:
The Bf-109G-6 at the Australian War Memorial is completely original including much of it's paint and is a combat vet.


Not airworthy though, which was the criteria set in the OP.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2020 5:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 7:18 am
Posts: 671
Location: Berkshire, UK
Joe Scheil wrote:
Black 6 and the displays she flew were one of the few times enthusiasts got to see a real combat Vet 109 in the sky.


Being at Duxford for Black 6's first public display was one of those great never to be forgotten airshow memories, and in fact all of the times I saw it fly over the next 6 or so years was equally special (except for the last time of course but the less said about that the better)

Attachment:
Black-6-reduced.jpg
Black-6-reduced.jpg [ 74.98 KiB | Viewed 1925 times ]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2020 11:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 11:31 am
Posts: 609
Location: A pool in Palm Springs
"Missing the point entirely. Combat history doesn’t stop in 1945. As Tulio mentioned, Buchons served operationally in North Africa with the Spanish Air Force."

I disagree with this point. While they served operationally they were never "in combat" with Spain against another nation in a conflict that I am aware of. Also I think the spirit of the post was taken to be with the Luftwaffe.

As to historic and special variants, the Avia CS-199 is something else entirely with a really rich and important contribution to the state of Israel and the founding of the nation. An excellent book is out on that aircraft and has color photos of the original paint on a component of the sole survivor of her type.

https://www.amazon.com/S-199-Israeli-Fo ... 0977462714

Attachment:
cover.png
cover.png [ 582.31 KiB | Viewed 1815 times ]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2020 5:46 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5663
Location: Minnesota, USA
Joe Scheil wrote:

...As to historic and special variants, the Avia CS-199 is something else entirely with a really rich and important contribution to the state of Israel and the founding of the nation...




Did the Avia CS-199 actually serve with the Israelis?

I've seen some plastic models with 'what if' markings, but can't remember seeing an actual pic of one in IAF service.

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Ken and 306 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group