JohnTerrell wrote:
I would say that even the two rebuilt/flying Bf-109E's, mentioned in this thread, are not quite the combat-vets they're described to be, as there is so little to nothing of the originals contained within them. They're not too unlike/different than the Hangar 10 Bf-109G-6 either, which didn't start out as a Buchon like all of the other "G's" currently flying, but is essentially an all-new-build, based on a combat-vet wreck/identity. None of these have the amount of originality as say the Bf-109G-2 "Black 6" that flew in England up to 1997. There are a few more Bf-109E's under restoration in Europe, and another very close to flying (WkNr.1983), that also have original, combat-vet identities, but have very little to no original parts of the airframes they're claimed to be. One that should be quite original, however, when it is eventually completed/flying, is the Bf-109E WkNr.4034, under restoration by Guy Black in the UK, which is in fairly good condition, and very complete, and Guy Black has his mind set on using as much original parts of the airframe as possible, and other original Messerschmitt parts where needed, in the restoration, and will be trying to minimize the amount of new material that will need to be used.
Yeah, the remains of the FHC one were dug from the French beach into which it crashed, so a few corroded bits and the data plates.
The ex-Price/Russell one was quite complete when discovered IIRC, but wasn't the fuselage badly damaged during the rough recovery, or was that another one?
What has become of that complete yellow nose Emil that Jim Pearce found in a fresh water lake and was photographed after recovery pretty much intact and complete sitting on its u/c in a field...?