bdk wrote:
Russ Blow wrote:
Speculation serves no purpose.
I respectfully disagree. I think speculating allows you to explore other scenarios you might be able to learn from because you aren't limited by ony the facts in this specific incident. Instead of looking for fault or who moved which controls when, it might allow us to look at the bigger safety picture.
The fact that we don't know what happened to the missing Malaysian airliner MH370 allows us to explore many different scenarios from aircraft reliability, to radio procedures, to hardware and to mental health. If we just knew that the captain committed suicide, we might not have spent as much time exploring other possibilities.
I tend to agree with you and agree somewhat with Mark also. Rampant, wild, un-sourced rumor spreading probably doesn't provide any benefit and can hurt folks who are already hurting. Responsible, transparent, sourced discussion can be a beneficial thing to discuss and maybe prevent another potential mishap within the community. In my years of CG aviation experience, when we have a mishap and an urgent safety of flight observation is identified, we do not wait for investigations to be completed or announcements made. A message/phone calls is/are immediately sent out specific to the urgent safety of flight issue so others within the community are made aware of the issue and can take appropriate action to prevent another mishap. That's not speculation....that's being smart and looking out for others.
IMO....if responsible discussion is taking place and some people are still uncomfortable or disturbed, I would understand and would be sympathetic. I would then respectfully suggest they stop reading the thread if it is uncomfortable to them.
My lowly 2 cents worth of observation.......