Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Wed May 14, 2025 5:04 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun May 12, 2013 11:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 12:22 am
Posts: 536
Location: Tampa, Florida
Only 50,000$; what a steal!!!

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/05/12/ca ... le-as-50g/

_________________
My racing will fund my warbirding. Hopefully...

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/#!/ChristopherDeshongRacing
Twitter: https://twitter.com/ChrisDRacing


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 13, 2013 8:15 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
The 50K lets you into the bidding process only-

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 13, 2013 9:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 9:41 am
Posts: 540
Too bad it's not THE better known AF1. I wonder what the smallest aircraft was ever known as AF1, maybe a USAF Lear?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 13, 2013 9:41 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:32 am
Posts: 4324
Location: Battle Creek, MI
According to the NUMSAF, Ike's Aero Commander was the smallest AF-1.

http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=572


Interesting that the DC-9 has an N-number..is it airworthy? I'm surprised it didn't automatically end up in the NMUSAF collection.


SN


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 13, 2013 9:47 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 3:00 pm
Posts: 2147
Location: Utah
Nice, that would make a heck of an "exclusive" executive jet! Although, I would imagine that the fuel burn on an older plane like this would make a lot of serious operators think twice. And I wonder when the interior shots were taken, it might not be so pretty after sitting in the Arizona sun for a few years.

Tom P.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 13, 2013 10:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2011 5:06 pm
Posts: 16
Location: Kenmore, WA. USA
It's a VC-9C. All of the C-9 variants are being or have been retired. It didn't have an N number in service and my guess is it was a requirement to get one when it was transferred from the USAF to the GSA. I was surprised to see that it was ever used as an AF1 as the VC-9 was similar to the C-32/757 in its mission. Being used as AF2 I could totally see.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 13, 2013 10:51 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 3:45 pm
Posts: 2629
I have a bunch of A$$ time in those birds. :lol:

Image

_________________
45-47=-2


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 13, 2013 11:02 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5595
Location: Eastern Washington
famvburg wrote:
Too bad it's not THE better known AF1. I wonder what the smallest aircraft was ever known as AF1, maybe a USAF Lear?



To the best of my knowledge, no president ever flew on a C-21 (USAF Lear 35).
But the did fly on USAF Gulfstreams...C-20s...and of course JetStars (VC-140s) before that.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 13, 2013 11:08 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:51 pm
Posts: 1185
Location: Chandler, AZ
I seem to recall that there were two of them on the ramp at Willy when I was there a few weeks ago.

_________________
Lest Hero-worship raise it's head and cloud our vision, remember that World War II was fought and won by the same sort of twenty-something punks we wouldn't let our daughters date.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 13, 2013 11:55 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
It's only called AF 1 or 2 IF his nibs is aboard or the VEEP, when Nixon was heading into the sunset as Jerry was taking the oath of office, AF 1 became AF 26000 to ATC.

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 13, 2013 12:08 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:10 pm
Posts: 3245
Location: New York
But in popular American discourse, anything that ever rubbed against the posterior of sitting President is AF1 (or Marine 1, or in one case Navy 1) forever, and should have a temple built around it.

I'll be surprised if this does not find a home.

August


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 13, 2013 12:35 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:51 pm
Posts: 1185
Location: Chandler, AZ
k5083 wrote:
But in popular American discourse, anything that ever rubbed against the posterior of sitting President is AF1 (or Marine 1, or in one case Navy 1) forever, and should have a temple built around it.



So....Monica should be enshrined? Oh wait, that wasn't the posterior,was it? :crispy:

_________________
Lest Hero-worship raise it's head and cloud our vision, remember that World War II was fought and won by the same sort of twenty-something punks we wouldn't let our daughters date.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 13, 2013 1:09 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:10 pm
Posts: 3245
Location: New York
Well, we really don't know, do we?

But I believe any plane ML rode is designated "Air Force 69" or "Strategic Lustful Underling Transport 1" (generally known by the initials).

August


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 13, 2013 1:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 3:46 pm
Posts: 515
Location: CYYJ
Steve Nelson wrote:
Interesting that the DC-9 has an N-number..is it airworthy? I'm surprised it didn't automatically end up in the NMUSAF collection.
There were 3 VC9Cs; 73-1681/2/3. 73-1681 and 1683 are those at Williams civil registered N681AL and N683AL, 73-1682 has indeed gone to NMUSAF presumably without taking up N682AL which the FAA shows as unassigned.

I imagine they could be made airworthy quickly if they aren't already. Good luck proving it ever was AF1 and for whom.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 13, 2013 1:37 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
WallyB wrote:
Steve Nelson wrote:
Interesting that the DC-9 has an N-number..is it airworthy? I'm surprised it didn't automatically end up in the NMUSAF collection.
There were 3 VC9Cs; 73-1681/2/3. 73-1681 and 1683 are those at Williams civil registered N681AL and N683AL, 73-1682 has indeed gone to NMUSAF presumably without taking up N682AL which the FAA shows as unassigned.

I imagine they could be made airworthy quickly if they aren't already. Good luck proving it ever was AF1 and for whom.



Well it's generally an accepted fact that Elvis owned and drove every pink 1956 Cadillac ever built :lol: :roll: :wink:

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 317 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group