Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Jun 06, 2025 3:59 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: B-17 Swamp Ghost news
PostPosted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 4:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 7:06 pm
Posts: 424
Howdy All

Swamp Ghost Update

http://www.staradvertiser.com/news/brea ... =202375641

Lightning


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:39 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 10:14 am
Posts: 1694
Location: canada
I dont mean any offense but I wonder how much damage she has received being moved around the place since she came out of the swamp?

_________________
Cheers,
Peter

________


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 8:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 1:44 pm
Posts: 386
Location: Nashua, NH
This is the part that I don't understand: "will be on display in a specially constructed outdoor exhibit". I have never been to the museum there, but have we not learned that outdoor storage of aircraft in humid environments near an ocean is not a good idea. After spending $5 million to restore the aircraft, how about spending a little more to keep it indoors away from the environment. I know the aircraft was in the jungle for 60+ years, and it has been outside since arriving here in the US, but I think a permanent display needs to be done indoors.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 9:18 am 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
I'm hoping that poor reporting has struck again and that means a diorama, not actually leaving the aircraft exposed to the elements.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 9:46 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 5744
Location: Waukegan,Illinois
kmiles wrote:
This is the part that I don't understand: "will be on display in a specially constructed outdoor exhibit". I have never been to the museum there, but have we not learned that outdoor storage of aircraft in humid environments near an ocean is not a good idea. After spending $5 million to restore the aircraft, how about spending a little more to keep it indoors away from the environment. I know the aircraft was in the jungle for 60+ years, and it has been outside since arriving here in the US, but I think a permanent display needs to be done indoors.

Displaying the plane outside is ridiculous!!!!!!!

_________________
Ain't no sunshine when she's gone!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 11:59 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:23 pm
Posts: 2346
Location: Atlanta, GA
Deep breath. If they are planning on spending $5M and it being the museum's "crown jewel", one would think that it will be an indoor diorama or some sort of climate/humidity controlled dome. Or, maybe they will save the $5M and scrap it for beer cans. Who knows?

Ken

_________________
"Take care of the little things and the big things will take care of themselves."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 12:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2004 9:20 pm
Posts: 858
Location: Lincoln, California
Before everybody gets too excited about the prospect of an outdoor display, I refer to the museum's actual press release:

http://www.pacificaviationmuseum.org/news/presspdf/B17EArrives.pdf

It would appear the airplane will be reassembled and temporarily displayed (in a "garden setting"--outdoors??) in the swamp setting until funds can be raised, then restored to static display condition (presumably on its landing gear) and then displayed indoors in the museum display hangar.

_________________
Scott Thompson
Aero Vintage Books
http://www.aerovintage.com
WIX Subscriber Since July 2017


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 2:08 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 5744
Location: Waukegan,Illinois
aerovin wrote:
Before everybody gets too excited about the prospect of an outdoor display, I refer to the museum's actual press release:

http://www.pacificaviationmuseum.org/news/presspdf/B17EArrives.pdf

It would appear the airplane will be reassembled and temporarily displayed (in a "garden setting"--outdoors??) in the swamp setting until funds can be raised, then restored to static display condition (presumably on its landing gear) and then displayed indoors in the museum display hangar.

Thanks for the clarification Scott.

_________________
Ain't no sunshine when she's gone!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 2:56 pm 
Offline
No Longer Active - per request

Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2010 4:17 pm
Posts: 220
Location: Alaska
DARN! There goes my vision of the "WORLDS COOLEST WEATHER VANE!!" :( :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 8:22 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 2:02 am
Posts: 4700
Location: Yucca Valley, CA
I see wings and tail in the video but no forward fuselage - is that still at Chino?

_________________
Image
All right, Mister Dorfmann, start pullin'!
Pilot: "Flap switch works hard in down position."
Mechanic: "Flap switch checked OK. Pilot needs more P.T." - Flight report, TB-17G 42-102875 (Hobbs AAF)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: From another forum
PostPosted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 7:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 6:13 pm
Posts: 283
Location: Virginia, US
http://www.network54.com/Forum/149674/m ... selage+....

The museum is looking for help with the project.

Richard

_________________
I am but mad north-north-west: when the wind is southerly I know a hawk from a handsaw.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 3:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 5:50 pm
Posts: 369
Location: Corona, CA
Chris Brame wrote:
I see wings and tail in the video but no forward fuselage - is that still at Chino?


Nope...it all was loaded onto the trucks at the same time.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 9:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 1:35 pm
Posts: 636
I heard that an old mid 70's Air Classics magazine that has an article about this plane. The author of the article helicoptered out to the plane and took pics and went inside. Back then the water level was up about 1/3 to 1/2 the the fuselage height. He had to go underwater to get to different parts of the fuselage.

_________________
Well if I can't rollerskate around my playpen while smoking and drinking a beer, I'm staying home..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 11:21 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 9:24 pm
Posts: 1748
Location: atlanta,georgia
All I will say is what a shame.

_________________
Hang The Expense


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 8:41 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 8:54 am
Posts: 3330
hang the expense wrote:
All I will say is what a shame.

Beats leaving it in the swamp in my book


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AG pilot and 259 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group