Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue Jun 24, 2025 5:57 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 6:45 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
warbird2 wrote:
So it sounds like nothing is different that would be noticable to the average person?

Today, not unless you know what you are looking for, and are looking really closely, or you have trustworthy documentation with unambiguous provenance.

Of course back when they were first built or in service, the date, user and context would answer the question.

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 7:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 2:32 pm
Posts: 328
warbird2 wrote:
So it sounds like nothing is different that would be noticable to the average person?

Thanks for the answers gentlemen.


Simplifying or ignoring accurate history doesn't tend to work too well for anyone involved. I don't see how lessening the significance of the CAC production would be a net positive for anyone.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 5:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2004 11:36 pm
Posts: 73
On the couple of CAC mustangs that I've seen somewhat "naked" revealed some Anodized grey wing skins in some areas
and some anodized parts as I recall. I believe I saw some anodized
longerons. May have been a lot more parts as well. That was back in the 90's.

Mike V


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 5:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 3:46 pm
Posts: 515
Location: CYYJ
Randy Haskin wrote:
There's a dataplate and a clear title in there, so certainly it's rebuildable!
You said it :supz: .


Last edited by WallyB on Wed Jul 20, 2011 6:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 5:38 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
gale_dono wrote:
Simplifying or ignoring accurate history doesn't tend to work too well for anyone involved. I don't see how lessening the significance of the CAC production would be a net positive for anyone.

When the objective is "Git 'er flying", or "Git 'er sold" history can come second to paperwork 'convenience' (or viability of restoration) and changes to achieve the result - some, like new pipes and systems very sensible, others, no so much...

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 7:19 pm 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 11471
Location: Salem, Oregon
Quote:
There's a dataplate and a clear title in there, so certainly it's rebuildable!

Even if it's hit in mid-air by a 500# bomb or it hit the ground straight on going 600 mph???? WOW!!!

_________________
Don't touch my junk!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: APG85 and 25 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group