Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat May 10, 2025 10:04 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 2:19 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11319
That seems very clear to me. Anything goes wrong you pay August to sort it out... :lol:

By the way, that pretty much is modern libertarianism in a nutshell.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 3:18 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:10 pm
Posts: 3245
Location: New York
Huh. I did not know that about libertarianism, but then I don't know much about libertarianism at all. I never realized libertarians were such great friends of tort liability. Under an ex post compensation regime, you would need quite a strong state apparatus to make sure that people can be sued and held responsible for the consequences of their actions, and judgments extracted from them. My impression was that this would kind of chafe libertarians. I tend to think of libertarianism as "I do what I want, tough luck if it harms you" but that may be an outdated notion.

August


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 5:58 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
the330thbg wrote:
huh? :?

Big man sharing big thinking in playskool place. :shock:

But don't worry, there's always TV, I'm assured. ;)

Ryan, no ya don't. You'd have a problem with the moral vacuum for one.

August's assuming that there will be regulation remaining with an enforceable legal system. Rather than multinational (offshore) private enterprise able to say 'f**k you' to national government - as in certain African countries for instance. [Edit: Cross post with 'liberty for me'!]

Just being awkward.

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 6:42 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:29 pm
Posts: 4525
Location: Dallas, TX
JDK,

I don't know. I tend to separate in my mind (perhaps wrongly) the idea of Law, and the rule of law, and regulation. When I think of a law, I think of it as based on a higher moral standard, it must have a sanction, and really be wrong. usually, I think that a just law could be understood and appreciated by most people with enough thought, and is usually based on the principles found in more basic laws.
Regulation on the other hand, usually means to me more oversight, and control of an industry, often involving protection for established businesses and generally frowning upon innovations or ideas that might indeed be dangerous, but not necessarily morally wrong. It also seems to be aimed at prevention, rather than sanction. It also usually involves things like licensing and privilege - thereby implying that a government has a right to deny you access to a line of work or business. That's something I generally oppose myself. Mind you, I'm not sure I want just anyone jumping into a plane, but I think reasonable application of laws could deal with the issue instead of licensing. Frankly, I'm more scared of car drivers... some of whom aren't licensed around here.

Maybe that's confused, but maybe not.

Ryan

_________________
Aerial Photographer with Red Wing Aerial Photography currently based at KRBD and tailwheel CFI.
Websites: Texas Tailwheel Flight Training, DoolittleRaid.com and Lbirds.com.

The horse is prepared against the day of battle: but safety is of the LORD. - Prov. 21:31 - Train, Practice, Trust.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 7:01 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11319
k5083 wrote:
Huh. I did not know that about libertarianism, but then I don't know much about libertarianism at all. I never realized libertarians were such great friends of tort liability. Under an ex post compensation regime, you would need quite a strong state apparatus to make sure that people can be sued and held responsible for the consequences of their actions, and judgments extracted from them. My impression was that this would kind of chafe libertarians. I tend to think of libertarianism as "I do what I want, tough luck if it harms you" but that may be an outdated notion.
No, that is anarchy. Modern libertarians believe (generally) that the government exists to enforce contracts (among other limitied and well defined duties). If you dump a pollutant in the river I irrigate with that ruins my crop, then I sue you for damages. The government provides the courts and the means to enforce the decision.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 7:13 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 6:08 pm
Posts: 2595
Location: Mississippi
as opposed to a strong government which prevents your polluting the river in the first place. :mrgreen:

_________________
"I knew the jig was up when I saw the P-51D-20-NA Mustang blue-nosed bastards from Bodney, and by the way the blue was more of a royal blue than an indigo and the inner landing gear interiors were NOT green, over Berlin."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 8:30 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:29 pm
Posts: 4525
Location: Dallas, TX
muddyboots wrote:
as opposed to a strong government which prevents your polluting the river in the first place. :mrgreen:

Not quite accurate - the strong government prevents you from accidentally polluting the people's river in order to protect the people so they can keep providing income for those on the higher levels of equality... :lol: All the while making sure that no significant production comes from said crops, there being no incentive to really work anyway. :wink:

Ryan

_________________
Aerial Photographer with Red Wing Aerial Photography currently based at KRBD and tailwheel CFI.
Websites: Texas Tailwheel Flight Training, DoolittleRaid.com and Lbirds.com.

The horse is prepared against the day of battle: but safety is of the LORD. - Prov. 21:31 - Train, Practice, Trust.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 8:51 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 6:08 pm
Posts: 2595
Location: Mississippi
:lol: :rolleyes:

_________________
"I knew the jig was up when I saw the P-51D-20-NA Mustang blue-nosed bastards from Bodney, and by the way the blue was more of a royal blue than an indigo and the inner landing gear interiors were NOT green, over Berlin."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:01 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:10 pm
Posts: 3245
Location: New York
Bdk, thanks for that information on libertarianism. I always have had trouble distinguishing it from anarchism.

Muddy, you're absolutely right about government regulation. However, if the regulation-free environment works the way libertarians think it should, then the river will not be polluted in the first place anyway, because if the polluter is acting within his rights, the farmer will have paid him not to pollute the river (contract) and if he is not, he knows in advance that the farmer will sue him for doing it (tort law).

Of course, all of this depends on the farmer knowing, and being able to prove fairly costlessly, that the polluter is polluting the river -- the economic assumption of "perfect information" -- and the further assumption that individuals make rational decisions. These are two of several assumptions needed to make libertarianism and price-theory economics work that can readily be shown to break down often, indeed nearly always, in the real world. That is why those theories are inadequate to govern anything really important. But I would be willing to give them a shot at governing manned space travel. I'll just make a note not to build myself a house near a launch facility.

August


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:18 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:29 pm
Posts: 4525
Location: Dallas, TX
The other problem that some of us see with heavy governmental regulation is that industries tend towards centralization and monopolies. Then, when you still end up with a problem, even under the regulations, then it affects a WHOLE lot more people. If you have one little farmer serving his neighbors, even if he makes a mistake, it's relatively contained. When some big meat packer manages to get around the regulations, or someone doesn't properly carry out their oversight, then you have a huge problem with whole states affected.
Or big programs like a space shuttle, where one little mistake can overcome a mountain of paperwork and oversight that is supposed to keep disasters from happening.

Ryan

_________________
Aerial Photographer with Red Wing Aerial Photography currently based at KRBD and tailwheel CFI.
Websites: Texas Tailwheel Flight Training, DoolittleRaid.com and Lbirds.com.

The horse is prepared against the day of battle: but safety is of the LORD. - Prov. 21:31 - Train, Practice, Trust.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:29 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:10 pm
Posts: 3245
Location: New York
RyanShort1 wrote:
The other problem that some of us see with heavy governmental regulation is that industries tend towards centralization and monopolies.


Actually, that is a natural tendency of industries under free markets. Government sets itself the goal of restraining that tendency, e.g. through antitrust laws, but doesn't always do a very good job.

August


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group