Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue Aug 19, 2025 10:57 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: VULCAN XH558
PostPosted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 7:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 9:44 am
Posts: 163
http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/vulcan-XH558/

For those that can sign......


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 7:39 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 8:54 am
Posts: 3332
Remind me again why this colossal waste of money (which has used up around $15m so far to get to a handful of airshows, and has missed as many again due to unservicability) should be funded by the government?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 10:35 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3414
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
First, it's not funded by the government. It's partially funded with Lottery Grants, just as several warbirds here in the states get various federal and state grants for some of their projects. The petition only asks for the Prime Minister's office to help in the effort to secure funding. This is one underutilized source of funding for museums that needs to be utilized more. Then again, you're in the US, what should you care what the Brit's do? ;)

Either way, what better way to spend profits from a national lottery or company "required charity" fund than to help support a piece of Cold War history?

Also, remember that 558 hadn't flown in over a decade prior to this year. The fact they were even able to make one show is a miracle, especially given that this is a bone stock aircraft that had quite a few maintenance issues when in regular service with the RAF and still is a very technology intensive aircraft even by today's standards.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 8:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 6:18 pm
Posts: 3
Location: Australia
Thanks CAP for correcting the previous poster, while I do have some mixed feelings about this project you cannot help but be in awe of the old girl when you see her in the air.

It is an amazing acheivement really considering that there is no military involvement in her at all. The equivalent would be someone privately owning and operating a B-47 on a full certification in the US.

Something you may not be aware of but in order to get her certification all non working equipment and associated services had to be removed. Consequently XH588 flies several tonnes lighter than her operational sisters did.

I was fortunate enough to be in the UK and at Duxford on the 6th of September when she flew in as part of the 90th anniversary airshow. She was due to attend on the 7th as well but the weather didn't co-operate (she flies on visual flight regs) and she unfortunately missed her slot on the Sunday.



Image

Image

Image

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 9:10 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
UK Heritage Lottery Funding is allocated by the UK Government. It is primarily derived from a m0ron tax on public gambling, so it's a worthwhile output from people's stupidity.

Normally the requirement is that HLF provide 50% of 'private' funding requests, the other 50% being match funding requirement, with a detailed business plan a very sensible set of checks and balances. Some government / heritage tasks are fully government funded by the HLF.

Funding given to the Vulcan project is government funds not spent elsewhere in the heritage industry.

Despite the magnificent efforts by the Vulcan engineers and workers, the serviceability has been what you might expect; with several missed show bookings. The management of the project in the PR and funding aspect remains, IMHO, very poor and unrealistic.

This therefore remains the precedent setter for funding towards airworthy aircraft restorations; not a particularly good one, also particularly as the main thrust was expected / required to be on the 'educational' front, something hardly noticeable from the team.

I've tried to keep an open mind on the whole project, and I applaud the achievement of those who've got the world's most complex, expensive and advanced warbird project into the sky. I wouldn't employ their non-engineering management and publicity team to run a whelk stall.

Even pre-international financial crisis, funding and sponsorship is not in place for the future, at all. Currently the chances have been pushed even further away. They need a financial miracle. A UK government petition (IMHO) is an emotional sop.

I'm sure some Vulcan team advocates can promote the project more than I would, and their views are just as valid as mine, I'm sure!

Cheers,

(Declaration: I undertook a HLF created and funded job in a local government museum in the UK.)

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 10:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 6:18 pm
Posts: 3
Location: Australia
JDK the things you list pretty much sum up many of my misgivings about this project. My previous post was just pointing out my admiration for the technical aspects of the project and the sight of seeing this amazing aircraft flying

It should be pointed out that HLF has been on record (before XH588 and since) as saying that they are not in the business of funding/supporting airworthy projects so the precedence set here is more of the exception that proves the rule rather than a test case.

Did I get a buzz out of seeing XH588 fly at Duxford? absolutely

Do I think she will fly for the stated 10 odd years? not a chance

Do I think she represent a good return on investment? possibly not

Do I think that the money would have been better spent on other warbird projects? probably but the question has to be how much of the money donated for XH588 would have been available for other warbird projects if XH588 hadn't happened and how much was uniquely made available because it was THIS project and I'm not sure of the answer to that one

I would agree that the biggest failure has been the inability to secure a major sponsor and until (if) they do the funding will remain in a perilously hand to mouth state. Which is not the way to operate a complex aircraft such as this.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 10:35 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
Thanks Jafwasw,
Jafwasw wrote:
JDK the things you list pretty much sum up many of my misgivings about this project. My previous post was just pointing out my admiration for the technical aspects of the project and the sight of seeing this amazing aircraft flying

It's both amazing as an achievement and in the air. But while I was in the UK this past UK 'summer' I didn't bother trying to see XH558 again.

My memories of the latter period of her RAF display work were enough, for me, and along with the very good point about it being a lean, light Vulcan, that has to be laid against, I understand, not being flown as 'aggressively', as during her latter RAF career - sensibly enough, but for me removing one of the draws.

But that's my own preference. If you haven't seen one, you sure are missing one of the greats - another being Concorde. :(

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:08 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:16 am
Posts: 2309
It would be in better financial shape if 10% of the funding wasn't pissed away to pay Plemings wages...

_________________
Those who possess real knowledge are rare.

Those who can set that knowledge into motion in the physical world are rarer still.

The few who possess real knowledge and can set it into motion of their own hands are the rarest of all.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 12:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 5:02 pm
Posts: 786
Location: US
population. Worded properly it would point out that the issue is even bigger than just what the UK might decide. it may not carry any real weight but as the three stooges said "it coydent hurt!" (yes misspelled on poypuss)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Vulcan
PostPosted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:24 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 9:24 pm
Posts: 1748
Location: atlanta,georgia
That is just soooooo cool.I sure hope they can secure funding for futher flights.

_________________
Hang The Expense


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 41 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group