RareBear wrote:
As a senior member in CAP for more than 26 years, I would like to comment on some of the issues raised above.
I was in a Senior Squadron, so there were no cadets in my unit, and I interacted with them only at Group and Wing events. There were the usual percentage of para-military cadets, the gung-ho types that attempted to terrorize everyone else, but most of the cadets were good folks, and did what they were told correctly. This is where the rub comes, however, in that their level of instruction was quite frequently far below what was required to perform the job in an efficient and courteous manner. I fault their senior leadership for most of this.
I had a son who was in a Composite Squadron, and stayed about 18 months, until he had his fill of the gung-ho types and quit. I really couldn't blame him, as these kids bent the rules to suit themselves and their friends, and the senior leadership let them get away with it. As I was the Commander of my squadron at the time, I had several one-on-one conversations with their Commander, and got promises that things would change, but nothing ever did.
The saluting issue was one I made painfully clear to my squadron members. The exchange of salutes between CAP and military members was a courtesy, and definitely not a regulation. I always encouraged them to salute senior military officers, and to return the salutes of junior officers and enlisted personnel, but if a junior officer or enlisted member did not salute you, let it go. They were not required to do so.
Most of the time when you observe CAP cadets behaving inappropriately, you can trace it back to inadequate instruction and preparation by their senior leadership.
And yes, there are bad apples in the senior ranks as well. I've run across some real a$$e$ in my 26 years.
Walt
This pretty well sums up what you'll find in any para military organization. The bottom line is that organizations like CAP are extremely dependent on seniors who are motivated to administer the program from the top on down. This assumes a positive motivation by those joining organizations like CAP. ANY and ALL OTHER motivation other than this required positive motivation degrades the program considerably.
Unfortunately for CAP, the very nature of the program, both the wearing of the uniform AND the opportunity to administer authority are the EXACT factors that lure some with the wrong incentives to join.
I wouldn't attempt to put a solid percentage on this factor but in the case of CAP and my personal experience with the organization, it is high enough to have been noticeable and of concern to me as a senior member of the organization.
In the 50 odd years I've been in professional aviation, I've both tried the CAP as a senior member and watched as an outsider how the program is administered by it's members. I've of course seen highly motivated people take part, but on average, I'm afraid I'd have to give CAP an overall failing grade based on my exposure to the program.
This by no means is meant to infer the program is a failure, but rather simply one man's personal experience and observation.