Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue May 05, 2026 4:07 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 10:56 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 2760
This is an odd topic, I know, but looking at pictures of various warbirds has me wondering about which warbirds did or did not have retractable tailwheels. Would there be any particular advantage to either have or not have a retractable tailwheel? I can only think of one advantage to having a retractable tailwheel - parasite drag. Any others?

So, which warbirds, big or small, with retractable main landing gear, DON'T have retractable tailwheels?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 11:16 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3418
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
Any DC-3 EXCEPT the Super DC-3s (like the R4D-7) and certain ones modified with it (like Cavanaugh's) and the T-6 are the only two I can think of off the top of my head.

There is only any noticeable drag created when you forget to lock the tailwheel and/or lock it in a trailing position.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 11:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 11:32 pm
Posts: 697
Location: KBLI
T6/SNJ

_________________
"They can teach MONKEYS to fly better than that"

http://www.heritageflight.org
http://www.bravo369.org


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 11:50 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 3:57 pm
Posts: 2400
Location: Minnesota
The Hawker Hurricane, early to mid/late model Spitfires and almost all Bf-109s.

These aircraft are early designs when compared to other fighter aircraft designed durring WWII. It is more simple to add a fixed tailwheel than to work out the mechanisms to make a retractable type. I can't think of really any advantage, other than it is one less thing to worry about failing. When the USAF was having bit of a problem with the tailwheels on Mustangs in the 50's, they simply fixed them in the down position.


Last edited by JohnTerrell on Sun Apr 20, 2008 11:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 11:52 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11336
It was all about drag. Why else would you add the complexity?

Most B-17s now flying have had the tailwheel retract system disabled.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 12:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 3:03 am
Posts: 958
Location: Creve Couer, MO
Yale

_________________
Eric

"I spent most of my money on alcohol, women and skyraiders....and the rest of it I just wasted."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 12:34 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 1:05 am
Posts: 3236
PT-17
Ryan STM
WACO UPF-7
Fairchild PT-19, -23, 26
DH Chipmunk (?)

Warbirds too, right? : )

Saludos,


Tulio

_________________
Why take the best part of life out of your life, when you can have life with the best part of your life in your life?

I am one of them 'futbol' people.

Will the previous owner has pics of this double cabin sample

GOOD MORNING, WELCOME TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Press "1" for English.
Press "2" to disconnect until you have learned to speak English.


Sooooo, how am I going to know to press 1 or 2, if I do not speak English????


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 12:38 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 2760
bdk wrote:
Most B-17s now flying have had the tailwheel retract system disabled.


Why is that? Is it just to cut down on the chances of something breaking?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 7:20 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
It is easy to forget the rapid pace of military aviaton development in the 1930s. It's often overlooked that the environment was very different in 1939 to what we saw in 1945, and what seems 'normal' in '45 was radical to a 1930s viewpoint.

JohnTerrell wrote:
The Hawker Hurricane, early to mid/late model Spitfires and almost all Bf-109s.


The Spitfire and Hurricane are actually interesting stories. The prototype Spitfire was originally fitted, like all good aircraft of the time, with a tailskid and skids made sense as they acted as landing brakes to slow aircraft automatically on landing - remember most airfields everywhere were grass. Good RAF pilots three-pointed their aircraft so they landed short, using what would now be regarded as small (circular) grass airfields.

Image

Image

A tailwheel was soon specified for production aircraft (probably as soon as someone tried to push the a/c anywhere) and the retractable tailwheel improvement came in on the Spitfire Mk.VIII. The Mk.IX took the Mk.V structure with the two-stage Merlin, but kept the fixed tailwheel of the Mk.V.

The Hurricane was designed and built with a retractable tailwheel! (Not many people know that.)

Image

However, as bdk's mentioned it gave endless trouble, and eventually, the prototype's tailwheel was fixed down.

Spin trials showed the Hurricane needed some ventral keel area at the tail, so a ventral fin was added to the early production Hurricanes, going some way to mask the now fixed tailwheel from some of the airflow; the tailwheel's keel effect being more useful, I suspect, than a couple of mph retracted.

Image

(Other British types with retractable tailwheels that didn't work properly and were fixed down in frontline service, either permanently or temporarily, included the original Bristol Blenheim, Short Stirling, Avro Manchester / Lancaster and Handley Page Halifax, IIRC. That's short version of a complex topic)

Cheers,

(Pics from var websites...)

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 7:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 2:01 pm
Posts: 353
In the immediate post war period, P\F-51D Mustangs normally operated with the tail wheel fixed in the down position, doors removed. In later versions of the manuals, original WWII era illustrations have a bar added to the national insignia and fixed tailwheels drawn in. Of course, the retractable function was retained and could be/was reactivated if needed. Seems it was a peace time maintenance savings effort.

_________________
Charles Neely


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 8:49 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 3:45 pm
Posts: 2685
L-2, L-3, L-4, etc.... tailwheel's always down. :D


Mike


Last edited by mike furline on Mon Apr 21, 2008 9:30 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 9:20 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 1:49 am
Posts: 1521
Location: Zurich & Zug / Switzerland
Swiss D-3801 and Swiss C-3603 - both without retractable tail-wheels

Image

Image

Image

Martin

_________________
Flying is easy: just learn how to throw yourself at the ground and miss


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: tailwheel
PostPosted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 9:27 am 
Offline
Probationary Member

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:53 pm
Posts: 3803
Location: Aspen, CO
Most Merlin Spits did not have retract tailwheels. First it was not really needed, fast climb and dive, turning ability, were more important, and you did not need the weight of the extra mechanism at the aft end. As top speeds went up to 450 mph the 5 or 10 mph streamline penalty of the little wheel down made it worth the retract.

_________________
Bill Greenwood
Spitfire N308WK


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: tailwheel
PostPosted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 9:33 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
Bill Greenwood wrote:
Most Merlin Spits did not have retract tailwheels. First it was not really needed, fast climb and dive, turning ability, were more important, and you did not need the weight of the extra mechanism at the aft end. As top speeds went up to 450 mph the 5 or 10 mph streamline penalty of the little wheel down made it worth the retract.

As outlined above, Bill, I find it amusing that the old technology Hurricane prototype was built with a retractable tailwheel, while the new technology Spitfire was given a fixed skid!

The single, prototype Spitfire Mk.III was the first fitted with a retractable tailwheel as part of the bells and whistles upgrade.

Image
Quote:
A prototype for the planned Mk III variant (N3297) first flew on 16 March 1940 - featuring a Merlin XX engine and many structural changes including a 'universal' wing able to accommodate a variety of weapons. This model was intended to replace the Mk I and II in production, but the Merlin XX was needed for the Hurricane II and production was switched to the Spitfire Mk V instead.


http://www.aeroflight.co.uk/types/uk/su ... tfire1.htm

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ???
PostPosted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 9:36 am 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 11475
Location: Salem, Oregon
Wildcat, SB2C, SBD, Zero, Oscar, Nate, Nell Sally ect
Oh and S-2 Tracker :shock: :lol:

_________________
Don't touch my junk!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 147 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group