Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sun Jun 29, 2025 1:43 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 8:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 11:52 pm
Posts: 393
Location: North Georgia
For all of you motor heads out there, you’re going to love this!

Pictured below is a recent acquisition of mine, and is probably the oddest and most unique piece of aero “junque” I’ve ever seen. What you’re looking at is a factory mockup of a Continental XO-1430-3 engine. It is a liquid cooled “flat 12” opposed piston engine. It is constructed primarily of wood, and the detail is absolutely incredible for this type of construction. It is also quite a massive engine, measuring over 6ft long by 4ft wide, and standing nearly 2ft tall on the mounts. Truly a beast!

I’ve been trying to determine exactly what this engine was conceived for, and I believe it MIGHT have been used in a XB-35 mockup? Any Northrop guys out there? I found a very old tag attached to the engine, part of which is missing, but by “filling in the blanks” it says in part “…..For Wooden Mockup Of Flying Wing”

I’ve been in touch with a Mr. Graham White who just so happens to own a Continental IV-1430 engine (one of only a handful known to survive, and the only one still operational) Graham was very helpful with my query into the XO-1430, but he was just as mystified by it as I am. He himself had never heard of an XO-1430 before either, and believed my example to be the only one to exist. Still more perplexing was the possible Northrop connection indicated by the tag attached to the engine.

Graham's IV-1430 can be seen here:
http://www.enginehistory.org/iv-1430.htm

Graham also indicated that NASM actually has manuals for the IV-1430, and that they could possibly have something on the XO-1430. I do intend to contact them about this, but I’m still waiting to hear back from them with regards to some XB-29 stuff, so in the meantime I’m hoping a WIXer out there might be able to help me out w/ this beast! The only thing I’ve found on the net about the XO is as follows:

"The US Army at McCook Field (later at Wright Field) began cylinder research in 1929 under the direction of S.D. Heron and others. By 1931, a twelve cylinder, V-12 liquid-cooled engine with {4.625 / 5.0 / 1008.0} had been developed. In 1934, the US Army increased the cylinder size to 1425 cu. in. for a V-12; this was redesigned further into the OL-1430 and tested in 1938. The motivation for a high-power HOAE was the promise shown for low-drag, in-wing installation, but this soon was seen as impractical (see, also, the Lycoming OL-1230). Later, the OL-1430 was redesigned into the Continental IV-1430, which was an inverted V-12.

12cyl; O-1430-1; 1150hp@3150rpm; 1938-1941; Wt = 1300#; TC = none.
Supercharged and geared to 0.455 or 0.556.
Aerofiles.com; AMC; BGE; BGP.
Applications: None found.

12cyl; XO-1430-3; 1500hp@3150rpm; 1938-1941; Wt = 1600#; TC = none.
Supercharged and geared to 0.336.
Aerofiles.com; AMC; BGE; BGP.
Applications: None found.
http://home.adelphia.net/~aeroengine/Continental2.html

I also found the following mentioned with regards to the XB-35:

“In November, 1941, two XB-35 prototypes were ordered by the Army Air Force. Preliminary design work began on the XB-35 early in 1942, and on July 5th of that year the mock-up Board from Wright Field inspected a full size wood mock-up of the centre section and a portion of the left wing.”

http://www.century-of-flight.freeola.com/Aviation%20history/evolution%20of%20technology/Northrop.htm

While the XB-35 ultimately used the -4360, there is no mention to the type of engine(s) employed in the partial mockup from 1942. This, coupled with the tag I found attached to the engine raises the question; could my XO-1430 have been used in this mockup? Can anyone confirm what type of engine was used in the mockup from ’42?

If anyone out there has any additional info on this engine, please post it here or e-mail me :wink:


Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

_________________
~Trevor McIntyre
http://www.TrevorMcIntyre.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 9:20 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:54 am
Posts: 5210
Location: Stratford, CT.
Trevor, amazing find!

Even though I do not know the origin of this mock up engine, it is still a historically significant piece
!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 9:24 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 12:15 pm
Posts: 1399
Location: San Diego CA
Wow! That thing is insane! I can only imagine what the sound could have been out of that thing if it ever got to the running stage! I have heard the Flat Porsche engines run a few times and they are wicked, this thing would have been king!

Cool find, hope someone knows what it is!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 9:33 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
Man, some real craftsmen worked on creating that. If wooden engines could fly that one certainly "wood" have back in the 40s! :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 10:18 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:42 pm
Posts: 2707
Location: NP, NJ, USA
Where in the world did ya find that baby? 8) Awsome.

_________________
Share your story: Rutgers Oral History Archive http://oralhistory.rutgers.edu/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 7:23 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 3:29 am
Posts: 84
Location: Armidale NSW Australia
that truely is a work of art.

please tell us the story of how it survived and came to end up with you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 9:40 am 
Offline
No Longer Active - per request

Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 1:40 pm
Posts: 1493
Too cool Trev...you seem to have a nack for sniffing out rare and hard to find aviation "goodies". :wink:

John


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 11:16 am 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:39 am
Posts: 4468
Location: Midland, TX Yee-haw.
We had four or five of those out here on the hill. Since we didn't know what they were, we just threw them away. :shock:

Okay, okay, just kidding. I'd love to be able to come up with some of that stuff you end up finding, Trevor. Nice grab with that prototype! :D

Gary


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 12:34 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 9:58 pm
Posts: 3282
Location: Nelson City, Texas
I checked on the Flying Wing book and no mention of the flat engine made. There is considerable talk about the problems of the 4360 gestation, so it seems resonable that they may have considered an alternate should the problems with the 4360 become insurmountable.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 2:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 5:35 am
Posts: 146
Location: West Lafayette, IN
Found mention of a Continental O-1430 in an article on Hyper Engines on Wiki.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyper_engine

Todd


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: MOCKUP
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 3:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:42 pm
Posts: 159
Location: Reno, Nevada
The horsepower rating of 1250 on the tag would seem too low to have anything to do with the XB-35. Possibly one of the earlier test aircraft like the N9M?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 5:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 2:24 pm
Posts: 819
Location: San Angelo, Texas
This site might shed some light on it! :wink:

http://www.aerofiles.com/motors.html

_________________
Bob


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 5:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 11:52 pm
Posts: 393
Location: North Georgia
John & Gary,

Yeah I do seem to have pretty good luck finding this oddball stuff! My motto is "If they made it, I can find it" :wink: Speaking of which John, did I tell you about that ball turret I found in that old timers barn a couple weeks back? He used it to store chicken feed in, worked pretty good actually :P

Here's my most recent prize, a DHC C-7 Caribou! "389" is an actual Air America ship, and once I learned this I just had to save her...or at least the first 20ft or so, anyway! When I get around to it, I'll be posting pics of the recovery ala Gary style. This is how she looked earlier today as I was leaving for the day...(pardon the "crime scene" tape!)

Image

As for the XO, I found it buried up in a storage building while sniffing out some other parts. Suffice to say the former owner decided they would rather have the free space instead of this engine, and that's when I got it. I didnt have a clue as to what it went to (and still dont!), but I recognized it as being something unique & special so I just had to have it!

_________________
~Trevor McIntyre
http://www.TrevorMcIntyre.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 5:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 2:24 pm
Posts: 819
Location: San Angelo, Texas
'Nother reference...

http://www.answers.com/topic/hyper-engine

:wink:

_________________
Bob


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 5:56 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
The N9M was built to run the Franklins. The XP-56 used the R2800.

The XB-35 used the 4360s and was supposed to ultimately switch over to the Northrop Turbodyne turboprop. A 1250 horsepower engine would never have been considered for the 172 ft Wing.

Maybe Continental built it on speculation that John Northrop would want to build a wing that would need a powerplant of this nature ?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], kalamazookid, quemerford and 45 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group