Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu May 01, 2025 8:34 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:53 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
how would you have liked to have been a ww 2 design engineer / assembler for the p-63 kingcobra?? yes, it had some success via lend lease with the ussr in ground attack, but it was a turkey over all, especially in the u.s., especially with an inglorious job it was assigned in the u.s. as the "pinball", which trained gunners & pilots in air to air target practice. painted orange, rigged with hundreds of light bulbs with hit sensors to detect hits from training machine guns modified to fire frangible (breakable ceramic bullets) on impact with armored points on the 63. the lights would register hits for trainees, thus grading their accuracy. the pilot, which must have been 1 brave soul regardless, was protected by heavy armor. but then.... the errant 1 in a million unlucky hit to body or bird!! :shock: i would have felt bad developing this type only to see it be relegated to such an ignominious service job. my question.... can anybody relate any stories from the unlucky bastards that were pegged to fly the type in training??? i wonder if some female wasp pilots flew the type too!!! all must have been brave!!! how about comments from shooters who worked the pinball types over in training??? how many 63's served in this capacity??

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 10:22 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
P-63 was NOT a turkey but by the time it was available other types were already doing the job for USAAF. USAAF also turned it down because of previous poor performance of the P-39, they ignored the fact that the P-63 was a completely new airplane with a commensurate increase in performance.

As for RP-63 Pinballs the only intact survivor that I know of is on the parade ground at Lackland AFB. OUTSIDE !


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 10:44 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
you make a valid point rick, i was rather biased in my opinion. can't blame me though........ target duty plain & simple.... but what is a person to think??? hey, you saved some face for the type!! any info as to experiences from pilots as targets or pea shooters as aimers???

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 11:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 642
Hi;

I think Charley Nicholes P63 was a pinball They were much heavier do to thicker skins plus all of the sensors. Thanks Mike

_________________
IF YOU CAN FIND IT WE CAN FIX IT


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 1:36 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5663
Location: Minnesota, USA
Evidence would support Rick's opinion: P-63 was definitely not a turkey, nor required anyone's assistance to "save face."

Apparently the great VVS ace Pokryshkin, when encouraged by his superiors to convert his unit from P-39's to the superlative Lavochkin La-7, convinced those same superiors to supply P-63's instead. This has never been officially recorded in any VVS document, since the terms of Lend-Lease concerning the P-63 forbade it from being used on the German front. Instead, the Kingcobras were to be used to create an Asian air fleet for the Soviet Union's eventual declaration of war against Japan and invasion of Korea. Private journals of former VVS pilots published in the 1990's reveal the real story of P-63 combat on the German front.

If the P-63 was such a performance dud, then why would someone the caliber of Pokryshkin select it over such types as the later Yak and Lavochkin series fighters? I'm stumped.

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 8:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 3:57 am
Posts: 926
More than one of the "pinball machine" P-63's were actually shot down by the supposidly"Frangible" bullets.According to a book that I own on the P-39/63,flying the target planes wasnt a very popular assignment with pilots."Dohhh ! Ya think so?"

_________________
"WHAT ME WORRY?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 8:29 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9719
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
Image

Here is the pinball P-63 that is at the NMUSAF.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 8:42 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 1:43 pm
Posts: 528
Location: Fort Walton Beach FL
Well here are the many faces of RP-63G 45-57295 at Lackland AFB, TX.
Photo 1 was taken by Vince Reynolds, the others by me. Note in picture 2 and 3 it is correctly painted as a RP-63G. I understand and was told that a new General came to Lackland and said, either scrap or repaint that orange aircraft as it is ugly. Enjoy. John R. Kerr

1. 1963

Image

2. 1 July 1976

Image

3. Jan 1989

Image

4. Apr 1991

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 8:51 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
I think the armored skin is an overlay. Each panel has Dzus fittings holding them on the aircraft. The pinball name refers to lights on the aircraft that would blink registering hits on the aircraft.

Does the RP-63 at the NMUSAF retain all of its armor ?

The Lackland example is completely armored. You can see how much heavier everything is when compared to the CAF P-63F.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 8:54 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9719
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
You know, I am not sure. I think it might. I know that it still has the lights in it.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 9:42 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 9:52 am
Posts: 1949
Location: Virginia, USA
Does anyone actually have records which confirm that the Russians actually used P-63's in combat during WWII? I have always thought that they arrived too late to take part. I seem to remember this being written when the P-63's were recovered from the Kuriles a decade or so ago.

Cheers. Richard

PS. I love the P-39/P-63 aircraft!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 9:46 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 3:37 pm
Posts: 2755
Location: Dayton, OH
RMAllnutt wrote:
Does anyone actually have records which confirm that the Russians actually used P-63's in combat during WWII? I have always thought that they arrived too late to take part. I seem to remember this being written when the P-63's were recovered from the Kuriles a decade or so ago.

Cheers. Richard

PS. I love the P-39/P-63 aircraft!


Taken from Mr. Baugher's site:

Quote:
Of the 3303 P-63s built, 2397 were delivered to the Soviet under Lend Lease. All of these were delivered between 1942 and 1945, and 21 were lost during ferrying.

The means of transfer was for US pilots to fly the Soviet-bound machines from Niagra Falls to Selfridge Field, Michigan, stop for refuelling, and then to continue on to Truax Field in Madison, Wisconsin. The planes were picked up at Truax by female Soviet pilots, who flew them to Edmonton Field in Anchorage, Alaska and then over to the Soviet Union.

Very little is known about their service with the V-VS. Postwar Soviet sources tended to downplay their role in the war, in favor of stories which praised the home-built Ilyushin Il-2 Shturmovik. However, it is known that the P-63, like its P-39 cousin, was a potent ground attack aircraft and a good tank buster.

There were enough Lend-Lease supplied Kingcobras remaining in service in the Soviet Union after the war in Europe ended that they were assigned the NATO code name *Fred* when the Cold War got underway.



Seems that they were in Russia early enough to contribute

Shay
____________
Semper Fortis


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 10:31 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5663
Location: Minnesota, USA
RickH wrote:
Does the RP-63 at the NMUSAF retain all of its armor ?


I don't believe the example at NMUSAF is an original RP-63, but rather one of the survivng P-63E's made to appear like one. Check out the following:

http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/factsh ... asp?id=485

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 10:49 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 3:08 pm
Posts: 4542
Location: chicago
why were they prohibited from action on the German Front?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 10:49 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
That makes perfect sense, mock up an aircraft that has its own historical provenance to look like something else while a real example rots in the Texas sun !

It just gets better and better. :x


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], rcaf_100, WIXerGreg and 290 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group