Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Apr 30, 2026 12:21 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 85 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 8:03 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 3:37 pm
Posts: 2755
Location: Dayton, OH
You wouldn't think that the USAF would have an issue with a Thunderstreak taken to the sky again. To say F-84s can't fly but F-86s can doesn't make sense to me. But again I'm only in the bleachers watching the game.

Also there might be difficulty if an American citizen wanted to buy a foriegn operated F-84F. As the were all issued USAF serials before being sold to their respective Air Forces and probably fall under some Weapons Assistance Trade program. Which wouldn't allow them to be privately owned and operated. :roll:

Shay
____________
Semper Fortis


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:08 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
Paul, doesn't surprise me that you guys were contacted after 9-11. The bureaucrats are afraid of the people they work for. Common sense has no bearing on their thinking. They are worried about a 50+ year old airplane simply because it has an "F" designation, nevermind that it might be totally impractical for ANY bad guy to use it in a threatining manner ! The last bad guys they dealt with used B-757s full of thousands of pounds of fuel to do their dirty work. So what do our govt heroes do ? They start verifying that long dead severely obsolete aircraft are still chained to the ground ! On the UH-1s, why should they care ? There are thousands out in the real world as well as bigger,better,newer, and more accessible civilian helicopters all over this country that are more suitable for bad guy work than a couple of old Hueys! How stupid. :evil:

On the F-84/F-86 comment. News flash The same people in the USAF, NMUSAF, and FAA who won't let an F-84 fly don't want an F-86 to fly, they also don't like the T-33, T-38, T-28,F-4, A-4, F-104, etc... flying. If they had a mechanism to ground and seize them, they would. Their take on those types of aircraft flying is that somehow the individuals that own and operate them are rogues who have somehow worked outside of carefully crafted rules that were put in place to specifically keep them from flying. I have seen letters accusing us of being irresponsible, thieves, and a danger to the system that could cause the very downfall of the National Museum system !

We actually had some lame brain write in a letter that the Navy was very uneasy about releasing a tactical jet aircraft (TA-4 Skyhawk) to civilians in light of 9-11. Nevermind that legislation had been passed into law mandating that it happen. I pointed out that we were talking about an 11,000 lb aircraft that with full fuel carried about 10,000 lb. You also don't just jump into a vintage jet, start it up and go. It takes some effort to get it into the air.

Paranoia, that's all it is paranoia.


Last edited by RickH on Wed Jan 03, 2007 3:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:24 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:49 am
Posts: 1635
Location: Belgium
Shay wrote:
Fouga23 wrote:
I too wonder why there is no thunderstreak/flash flying. Although when I see how many crashed due to engine and other problems,.... :?


What source are you getting your information from??? I have found nothing to substantiate you claim. Please correct me if I'm in error.

I'm just going from memory here, but I seem to remember we (Belgium) lost a fair number due to engine problems. On the other hand, wouldn't be the first time my failing memory is wrong ;-)

_________________
Magister Aviation
It's all in my book

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:35 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9721
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
I agree with Rick. I am starting to see more and more that the government would rather see a plane get destroyed then go to a museum that wants to fly it. A B-52, I can see the worries, but stuff like the F-84, F-86, F-105. Come on. I argued with the NMUSAF about getting some smal parts off of a C-123 in the desert that is never going to be used to the Air America Foundation. They would not hear it.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Director


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 2:38 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11336
Shay wrote:
Also there might be difficulty if an American citizen wanted to buy a foriegn operated F-84F. As the were all issued USAF serials before being sold to their respective Air Forces and probably fall under some Weapons Assistance Trade program. Which wouldn't allow them to be privately owned and operated.
Importation and operation are two completely different things. The ATF&E needs to approve the importation on a Form 6 as Significant Military Equipment. The state department deals with approving importation of aircraft that were given away under Lend-Lease or a Military Assistance Program. The FAA deals with airworthiness issues. If you have ownership I don't see how the FAA could prevent you from flying unless they refused to issue an airworthiness certificate or issued onerous operating limitations.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 2:54 pm 
Offline
Pvt. Joker
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 12:22 pm
Posts: 1012
Location: Location: Location!
RickH wrote:
We actually had some lame brain write in a letter that the Navy was very uneasy about releasing a tactical jet aircraft (TA-4 Skyhawk) to civilians in light of 9-11.

I had a visit from a Three Letter Agency post 9-11 regarding a certain warbird project in the hangar.

You know how dangerous those Stearmans are.

_________________
Image
Commemorative Air Force
Experimental Aircraft Association
Warbirds of America

What are you waiting for? Join us!

Best way to contact me- email my last name @gmail.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 4:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 11:52 pm
Posts: 393
Location: North Georgia
mustangdriver wrote:
I argued with the NMUSAF about getting some smal parts off of a C-123 in the desert that is never going to be used to the Air America Foundation. They would not hear it.


No kidding, you too??? I had the same results a few months ago! The NMUSAF seems to have an odd policy of not partaking in any trades that would not otherwise benefit/advance the collection held at the Nat. Museum itself. But on the same note they told me they may be releasing a quantity of -123 parts in storage at AMARC in the near future. At least we're on the list to be notified now! If anyone out there has a C-123 APU throttle cable, e-mail me!!

_________________
~Trevor McIntyre
http://www.TrevorMcIntyre.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 3:32 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9721
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
Here is the one off of the runway at KAGC. it is all there, but in rough shape.
Image
Image
Image


Along with the F-84 is an F-4, and an A-7

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Director


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 5:09 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
Hey Mustangdriver, is anyone from Dayton still talking to you ?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 6:20 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9721
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
No, not really. Since I talked to them about the F-105, and the Air America C-123. I don't hink they like me anymore. THe volunteers and I get along great, and that is what is important.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Director


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 6:43 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 3:37 pm
Posts: 2755
Location: Dayton, OH
I sent some correspondence to Gen. Metcalf back in Sept. I still have yet to recieve response.

Shay
____________
Semper Fortis


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 7:10 pm
Posts: 889
Location: Burlington, WI
Thanks for posting the pictures. Can't quite tell that it's an F84 under the tarps. Is it an F model? I searched on Google earth and never did find it at KAGC.
David


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:30 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9721
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
The sad thing is that it is an RF-84. If you are looking at the airport on google earth, look at the north east corner of the airport. The runway crosses a road. To the North west of this road is a large warehouse. They sit in the parking lot straight north of this building.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Director


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 10:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 7:10 pm
Posts: 889
Location: Burlington, WI
I would have never found them if you hadn't clued me in. Not recognizeable as aircraft. I did a trial run on the F84 in Kenosha Wi to see what it should look like. Totally different disassembled.
Thanks
David


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 10:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 642
Hi;

There is a complete RF84F[Minus tail section] at the vo-tec school in Thief River Falls This one was also used for engine runups :shock: try googling Thanks Mike

_________________
IF YOU CAN FIND IT WE CAN FIX IT


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 85 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 154 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group