Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Mon May 05, 2025 12:18 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: WWII Training Stages
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 2:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2005 6:36 pm
Posts: 917
Location: Valparaiso, IN
I have a question on WWII pilot training. I know when cadets began training they started in the PT series then onto the BT series. Now for bomber pilots did they do the AT-6 or did they go directly onto the AT-11 Kansan aircraft? Or did they do both? Hopefully someone can clear this up for me.

Thanks in advance!

_________________
"Keep 'em Flying!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 3:08 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 1274
Location: Oshkosh, Wisconsin
I have done quite a number of interviews with bomber pilots for EAA's Timeless Voices of Aviation oral history program, and most have said that they got AT-6 time before going into twins, usually the AT-9, AT-10, or AT-11. A handful went straight from Basic into twin-engine Advanced, but not too many. Hope this helps.

Zack

_________________
Curator - EAA Aviation Museum, Oshkosh, WI
"Let No Story Go Untold!"
http://www.timelessvoices.org


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 3:50 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 6:20 am
Posts: 1104
I've heard that towards the end of WWII, the BT stage was skipped altogether -- not just for bomber training. Can anyone confirm this one for me?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 4:00 pm 
Offline
Senior Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 12:22 am
Posts: 3875
Location: DFW Texas
My Uncle tells me he started in the, in his words, "Yellow Peril" Stearman and went from that to the AT-6...he only flew the BT-13 for exrta time. He then progressed to the "Bamboo Bomber" Cessna T-50. He spent a little time in B-25's then he became a B-24 flyer. Flew low level cross country flights till it got boring then flew a B-24 from Florida to Italy across the South Atlantic.

_________________
Zane Adams
There I was at 20,000 ft, upside down and out of ammunition.
_______________________________________________________________________________
Join us for the Texas Warbird Report on WarbirdRadio.com!
Image http://www.facebook.com/WarbirdRadio
Listen at http://www.warbirdradio.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 6:20 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 3:00 pm
Posts: 2147
Location: Utah
There are a number of records I have seen in my research for Wendover that seem to indicate that as the war progressed and bomber crews were desperately needed many pilots and copilots got into bombers with almost no time in anything but the T-6 or possibily some kind of fighter.

The accident reports are filled with hints and suggestions of green pilots trying to get a bird plane to act like a fighter.

Tom P.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 7:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 3:36 pm
Posts: 138
Location: Portage, MI
Yes, it's true that as the war progressed, the basic training stage was dropped from the training program. I don't know exactly when that happened, though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 7:41 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 6:20 am
Posts: 1104
Thanks, guys...........'Preciate it......


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 23, 2006 7:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2005 6:36 pm
Posts: 917
Location: Valparaiso, IN
I was always confused becasue the AT-11 Kansas had "AT" in the front and that meant Advanced Trainer so it was a little foggy. Thanks for the answers.

Happy Holidays!

_________________
"Keep 'em Flying!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 23, 2006 7:53 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 7:28 pm
Posts: 2184
Location: Waukesha, WI
I have written a book that is a collection of my Dad's letters home during his training times at San Antonio in 43. I call it "Fire from the Clouds" as he was a member of the 60th FS of the 33rd FG in China.

His experience went: PT-19, BT-13, T-6, P-40, P-47 then off to Asia. At the end of advanced training they were queried as to the type of flying they wanted single or multi engine. Obviously, Dad took single and then was transitioned from the P-40 to P-47.

His good buddy and classmate, John Dinou, author of "Fading Wings, Faded Glory" took multi engine hoping for P-38's but wound up in B-26's in Europe.

I can't say that this was the experience of all as I believe that various training bases and different times in the war used different trainers and progressions.

Hope this helps.

_________________
"There are old pilots and bold pilots but few old, bold pilots."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 23, 2006 8:51 pm 
Offline
Digital Sniper
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 11:59 am
Posts: 681
Location: Florida
Got a question of my own. How were you selected to be a bomber pilot vs a fighter or transport?

_________________
The conquest of space is worth the risk of life. - Gus Grissom


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 11:54 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 7:28 pm
Posts: 2184
Location: Waukesha, WI
I'm not exactly sure but I think a lot had to do with skill levels demonstrated and then perhaps need. But I think that it was like who was designated for navigators etc. If they had not demonstrated outstanding skills piloting fighters, they were redirected.

_________________
"There are old pilots and bold pilots but few old, bold pilots."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 12:41 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 12:35 pm
Posts: 1318
Location: Waukesha Wisconsin
sdennison wrote:
I'm not exactly sure but I think a lot had to do with skill levels demonstrated and then perhaps need. But I think that it was like who was designated for navigators etc. If they had not demonstrated outstanding skills piloting fighters, they were redirected.


The needs of the Air Corps came first, but often times the top graduates had a choice--how far down in the class rankings guys had their pick varied from class to class. My uncle graduated from pilot training near the top of his class in mid 1943 but chose C-47s instead of fighters. He said most of the guys in his class got transports to the South Pacific because that was the greatest need at that moment in time. A few of the top grads did have the option and chose single seat fighters.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Noha307 and 268 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group