Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue Jul 08, 2025 6:01 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: CAF P-82
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 5:56 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 6:37 pm
Posts: 1812
Location: Spring, TEXAS
Has anyone heard of any fresh news with the CAF's P-82 since the announcement of Tom Cruise playing a roll in its restoration?? :?:

Image

_________________
Never drive faster than your Guardian Angel can fly!!

http://www.390th.org/
www.LSFM.org

Trae


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 6:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 11:27 pm
Posts: 252
What when did this news come out? As much as I hate Tom Cruise if this is true I praise him, I want to see the P-82 fly!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 6:37 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 6:37 pm
Posts: 1812
Location: Spring, TEXAS
NathanT24 wrote:
What when did this news come out? As much as I hate Tom Cruise if this is true I praise him, I want to see the P-82 fly!


It came out in one of the magzines about a month or so ago..its been metioned on WIX as well if I remember correctly.

_________________
Never drive faster than your Guardian Angel can fly!!

http://www.390th.org/
www.LSFM.org

Trae


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 7:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 10:07 pm
Posts: 340
Location: Houston Tx.
I asked but no new news. http://warbirdinformationexchange.org/p ... highlight=

CAF West Houston
Tim Landers


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 8:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 11:27 pm
Posts: 252
Thank you, ok I dont hate TC as much now, now once the P-82 gets airborne it HAS to come to Wings Over Houston!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: CAF P-82
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 8:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 12:17 am
Posts: 741
Location: Burleson, Tx
Hello Tim. Just to save you a little time, the ownership of the P-82 is still in dispute between the CAF and USAFM. Basically as stated before, whose attorney's are better? Do a WIX search on "P-82" and you will see most of the past threads concerning all parties involved. Alan

_________________
Just call me Al.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 11:59 am
Posts: 50
Location: Sheboygan, WI
Has anyone here ever flown in a P-82?
Silly novice question:
Something I've wondered about the P-82, and, admittedly, I know very little about the subject, but it seems like it would be kind of a weird feeling when the plane banks over, and instead of rolling about the centerline, you kind of swing up & over the centerline?
Or maybe that isn't what happens?
'Course if I were in one I'd probably be too paralyzed with excitement to notice anyway... :shock:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 12:18 pm 
Offline
Warbird Pilot
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 7:16 am
Posts: 727
Location: USA
I have talked to someone who has flown the CAF P-82 that same question years ago. He said that it is not a big deal or very noticeable.
I would like to find out for myself.

_________________
Live to fly, Fly to live.....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 9:18 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 10:10 pm
Posts: 4409
Location: Maypearl, Texas
It doesn't do well when you stall it to land about 30 feet in the air though :shock:

Lynn


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 9:48 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 9:58 pm
Posts: 3282
Location: Nelson City, Texas
Thats' what happens when you keep both engines turning. H e did a lot better with one caged, of course he had Lefty in the other cockpit. Oops I mean flight deck.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 12:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:52 am
Posts: 775
Location: Arizona
Obergrafeter wrote:
Thats' what happens when you keep both engines turning. H e did a lot better with one caged, of course he had Lefty in the other cockpit. Oops I mean flight deck.


I thought the "botched" landing was a single engine one, no?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 7:32 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 9:58 pm
Posts: 3282
Location: Nelson City, Texas
No the landings earlier in the day were single engine, he and Lefty had been flying together and one engine was acting up and they came back with one caged. Apparentley they got it fixed and Ed took it up by himself and came back with two turning. Guess it scared him to have both engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 9:04 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 8:11 am
Posts: 2392
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Just a curious question.......

On the torque aspect....

The P38 & P82 must have much more pleasant flight behaviour in all aspect of their flight envelop due to the contra-rotating prop setup ??

Let's say versus a Mossie for example. Must be a huge help for takeoff & adding power during the landing approach ??

Input on the topic ?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: P-82
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2007 9:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 4:54 pm
Posts: 43
Location: Conroe, TX
Facts and rumors under post North American P-82 Twin Mustang N12102 & Squadron


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2007 11:12 am 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
Michel Lemieux wrote:
The P38 & P82 must have much more pleasant flight behaviour in all aspect of their flight envelop due to the contra-rotating prop setup ??

Let's say versus a Mossie for example. Must be a huge help for takeoff & adding power during the landing approach ??
It has more to do with the engine out characteristics of a twin as you have no "critical engine" with counter rotating props.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 36 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group