Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Wed Apr 30, 2025 6:47 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Nov 27, 2024 11:00 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:19 pm
Posts: 1569
Just seen that the T-33 mounted on a pedestal at Muskogee airport has been hit by an errant Cessna twin. Does anyone know if the T-33 is repairable?

Can only find it on FB - apologies:

https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10 ... 0938171362

T-33 s/n 53-4971.


Last edited by quemerford on Wed Nov 27, 2024 12:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Muskogee T-33 Midair
PostPosted: Wed Nov 27, 2024 11:13 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3293
Location: Phoenix, Az
How about changing your subject line so it reflex's that it was a STATIC T-33 and was NOT FLYING

_________________
Matt Gunsch, A&P, IA, Warbird maint and restorations
Jack, You have Debauched my sloth !!!!!!
We tried voting with the Ballot box, When do we start voting from the Ammo box, and am I allowed only one vote ?
Check out the Ercoupe Discussion Group on facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Muskogee T-33 Midair
PostPosted: Wed Nov 27, 2024 12:39 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:19 pm
Posts: 1569
Well it was a midair....

EDIT: Thread title changed to limit apoplexy.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 27, 2024 8:52 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 4:48 pm
Posts: 1917
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
So apparently the Cessna 340 carried the back of the T-33 with it!
Image
(Source: News On 6)

_________________
Tri-State Warbird Museum Collections Manager & Museum Attendant

Warbird Philosophy Webmaster


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 27, 2024 10:37 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5589
Location: Eastern Washington
Heck of a way for a 71 year old t-bird to end up.
On the bright side, if a museum needs some static T-33 parts, contact the Muskogee airport manager!

According to my list of loaned aircraft, it's still on the NMUSAF books, they likely won't want it back.

Wonder if they'll replace it...it probably depends on the condition of the stand?
What's the standard USAF donation type today?
F-16, T-38?

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 28, 2024 5:33 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 2:02 am
Posts: 4694
Location: Yucca Valley, CA
quemerford wrote:
Can only find it on FB - apologies:
T-33 s/n 53-4971.

Image

Image

_________________
Image
All right, Mister Dorfmann, start pullin'!
Pilot: "Flap switch works hard in down position."
Mechanic: "Flap switch checked OK. Pilot needs more P.T." - Flight report, TB-17G 42-102875 (Hobbs AAF)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 28, 2024 9:06 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 2:38 pm
Posts: 2662
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
There is a place in the fuselage where the airplane splits in half and that seems to be where it broke. There is a rear fuselage at the Walter Soplata Collection (in basement of house) if anyone wanted to acquire or4 repair this project. My guess is it will be taken down and returned to the USAF Museum . The tip tanks, canopy, wing fuel pumps, etc. are valuable.. Overall it is "beyond economic repair."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 28, 2024 10:35 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:19 pm
Posts: 1569
Most gate guards are beyond economical repair - that's where museum's step up!

I'd say this would be an ideal candidate for MAPS in Ohio - they've recently taken delivery of the 'Ohio Tornado' TF-104.

And I doubt there's anything left at Walter Soplata's now. But I'm sure a T-33 aft fuselage can't be too difficult to locate.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 28, 2024 1:18 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 2:02 am
Posts: 4694
Location: Yucca Valley, CA
Forgotten Field has (had?) one:
Forgotten Field wrote:
3094. P80 or T33 Tail Section. Some corrosion evident, and includes empennage in good condition(not in photos)

Image

Image

_________________
Image
All right, Mister Dorfmann, start pullin'!
Pilot: "Flap switch works hard in down position."
Mechanic: "Flap switch checked OK. Pilot needs more P.T." - Flight report, TB-17G 42-102875 (Hobbs AAF)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 28, 2024 2:41 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5589
Location: Eastern Washington
A full scale T-33 kit, the perfect gift.

Hope someone gets it...or the airport repairs it.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 28, 2024 7:19 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7796
Easy to repair. Plenty of T-33 parts still in existence. And the guy who broke it shouldn’t have a problem with the expenses.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 29, 2024 12:59 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5589
Location: Eastern Washington
I'm not concerned with the Cessna owner's insurance company, they'll be paying for repairs. The Cessna owner may not have hull insurance, but he'd have liability.

I'd be concerned that the airport will use this to "get rid of an eyesore"... or something.

Our major airport had a nice T-33 on display for years until it disappeared during a modernization or beautification project. Replaced by landscaping, cut rocks and a moose sculpture. Heaven forbid an airport having an airplane on display. :)

It will be interesting to see what happens. If the airport doesn't want to repair it, I guess they'd give it back to the NMUSAF or perhaps the museum would dispose of it locally.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 29, 2024 8:51 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:54 am
Posts: 5197
Location: Stratford, CT.
If they do decide to get rid of it, we sure could use those tip tanks on our TV-2.

_________________
Keep Em' Flying,
Christopher Soltis

Dedicated to the preservation and education of The Sikorsky Memorial Airport

CASC Blog Page: http://ctair-space.blogspot.com/
Warbird Wear: https://www.redbubble.com/people/warbirdwear/shop

Chicks Dig Warbirds.......right?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 29, 2024 12:50 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5589
Location: Eastern Washington
Warbird Kid
Give the airport manager a call next week and ask their intentions.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 29, 2024 9:10 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7796
JohnB wrote:
I'm not concerned with the Cessna owner's insurance company, they'll be paying for repairs. The Cessna owner may not have hull insurance, but he'd have liability.

I'd be concerned that the airport will use this to "get rid of an eyesore"... or something.

Our major airport had a nice T-33 on display for years until it disappeared during a modernization or beautification project. Replaced by landscaping, cut rocks and a moose sculpture. Heaven forbid an airport having an airplane on display. :)

It will be interesting to see what happens. If the airport doesn't want to repair it, I guess they'd give it back to the NMUSAF or perhaps the museum would dispose of it locally.

All speculation.

_________________
“Knowing what’s right, doesn’t mean much unless you do what’s right.”


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 283 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group