Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat May 10, 2025 3:19 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Oct 09, 2024 2:52 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7802
Who used the early Mustangs more?. I'm no expert in this area, but it seems the Commonwealth air forces (mostly the RAF) used the Mustang Mark I's, II's and III's for more roles than the USAAF. groups.

Several photos below credited to: Richard Miller via NAA

Image
P-51 Mustang Mk I, AG346, the first production aircraft to be supplied to the Royal Air Force, on the ground in the USA, July 1941.

Image
Mustang Mk I AG348 Inglewood.

Image
The first production P-51 Mustang (serial number AG 345) painted in RAF Markings and used as a prototype.

Image
RAF P-51 Mustang (serial number AG 349) with a P-40 Warhawk, A-20 Bostons and an A-28 Hudson.

Image
Mustang Mk I 1941.

Image

Image
Allison V-1710 Aircraft Engine correct?

Image

Image
Mustang Mark III, FX889, fitted with a 'Malcolm hood' at Boscombe Down, Wiltshire, following service with No. 122 Squadron RAF.

Image
Mustang IA that was used by Malcolm's for the design, development and prototyping of the 'bubble' hood for the early Mustangs.

Image
Malcolm Hood bulged out to the sides here is a head on view of it fitted to a Mustang I by RAF.

Image
Instrument fitters install a Type F.24 (14-inch lens) aerial camera into the port oblique position in a North American Mustang Mark IA of No. 35 (Reconnaissance) Wing at Gatwick, Sussex, England.

Image
Malcolm Hood Armourers of No 122 Squadron RAF hoist a 1,000-lb bomb into position on a North American Mustang Mark III.

Image
Mustang Mk.I AM106 at Boscombe Down. AM106 was one of several Mustang’s that was allocated for stores testing and trialed zero length rocket launchers, drop tanks and ultimately two 40mm gun pods. AM106 conducted flying and firing trials with the 40mm Vickers, but this weapon was never adopted by the RAF Mustang Squadrons.

Image

Image
Mustang Mk II FR901 with the streamlined external fuel tanks underwing

Image

Image

Image
Armament mods the RAF did to the Mustang I

Image
P-51 Mustang (serial number AG357G) fitted with an experimental rocket installation.
25lb Mk.I type, which was basically a 25lb artillery shell modified to fit as a solid AP shell for the RP-3 rocket motor.

Image
British markings being applied to an RAF Mustang Mk. I at North American Aviation plant in Los Angeles.
At the request of the RAF, North American redesigned the Mustang to be armed with four 20mm in place of the original armament of .30 and .50 caliber machine guns.

Image

Image
Mustang I serial number AM106 sometime during May to June 1943 with Vickers 40 mm "S" cannons.

Image
North American Mustang Mk I of the Air Fighting Development Unit at Duxford, Cambridgeshire, February 1942. Mustang Mark I, AG365, of the Air Fighting Development Unit, on the ground at Duxford, Cambridge. This aircraft subsequently saw much operational.

Image
Mustang Mk I AG422 the aircraft Ronnie Harker, a Rolls-Royce service liaison pilot, flew April 30th, 1942. Resulting in the testing of the Rolle-Royce Merlin in the Mustang.

_________________
“Knowing what’s right, doesn’t mean much unless you do what’s right.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 09, 2024 7:03 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 3:45 pm
Posts: 2628
Mark Allen M wrote:

Image
Allison V-1710 Aircraft Engine correct?

Image



I believe the above two photos are the XP-51J based on the large intercooler, lower engine mount and landing gear door (pointed lower leading edge).

Image


https://www.mustangsmustangs.com/p-51/v ... /prototype

XP-51J 44-76027, 44-76028

The testing of these lightweights led to a production aircraft, NA-126, the P-51H which began in April 1944. Soon after, the AAF ordered the testing of 2 XP-51J aircraft, still under NA-105, which were fitted with the new Allison V-1710-119. This Allison had a two-stage superchager like the merlin. Although the performance was promised to be similar with the XP-51F/G, there are some accounts that the J model Allison was never flight tested at full power. Rated HP was 1,500 considerably more than the first Allisons used. Reports say that the new Allison had problems and was not liked by Schmued or Bob Chilton, NAA's test pilot. The XP-51J was turned over the USAAF on Feb 15, 1946. It was later used as a testbed for the Allison V-1710-143 used in the P-82 Twin Mustang.

_________________
45-47=-2


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2024 7:16 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 8:11 am
Posts: 2391
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Nice series Mark!

Tks.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2024 1:24 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 12:28 pm
Posts: 1196
Inglewood has changed a bit!

Great shots, the XP-51J looks toy like.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 11, 2024 2:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2020 2:36 am
Posts: 400
Location: 5nm W of Biggin Hill
Gatwick has changed slightly as well...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 12, 2024 12:28 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:40 pm
Posts: 1470
mike furline wrote:
I believe the above two photos are the XP-51J based on the large intercooler, lower engine mount and landing gear door (pointed lower leading edge).



Not to mention the twelve exhaust stacks per side!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 12, 2024 12:29 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:40 pm
Posts: 1470
mike furline wrote:
I believe the above two photos are the XP-51J based on the large intercooler, lower engine mount and landing gear door (pointed lower leading edge).



Not to mention the twelve exhaust stacks per side!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 13, 2024 9:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 3:13 pm
Posts: 427
Good point! :lol:

Which begs the question: why the 12 exhaust stacks per side?

_________________
A Little VC10derness - A Tribute to the Vickers VC10 - www.VC10.net


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ErrolC, phil65, raconnel and 263 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group