Wed Oct 09, 2024 5:20 am
Wed Oct 09, 2024 6:55 am
Wed Oct 09, 2024 10:59 pm
Thu Oct 10, 2024 7:34 am
JohnB wrote:It would be neat (and affordable) to have an L-4 in 8th AF markings from some group.
I have seen the main photo before, but I don't think I've seen any closeups of a BG L-4 (or a UC-78 for that matter).
I can't imagine what they would have been used for...too small for parts hauling, VFR only (so not a lot of god in an English winter), not much of a trainer if you are used to anything heavy.
Used as a flying staff car for quick trips to Pinetree?
Thu Oct 10, 2024 11:44 am
Thu Oct 10, 2024 12:39 pm
JohnB wrote:Sandiego 89
I understand what the L-4 did in the Army (as opposed to the USAAF) as a liaison and artillery spotter...my comments were asking why a bomb group had one.
As the photo above shows, the B-17 group had one with its markings.
Thu Oct 10, 2024 4:38 pm
Thu Oct 10, 2024 5:01 pm
Thu Oct 10, 2024 6:28 pm
quemerford wrote:I'm assuming it would have been used in a communications role?
Thu Oct 10, 2024 7:51 pm
Dave Homewood wrote:Why would that taxiway have been built with all the curves in it? I thought taxiways were normally straight.
Fri Oct 11, 2024 2:19 am
Fri Oct 11, 2024 5:34 pm
phil65 wrote:Well, you do like to zig zag down the taxiway if you are in a taildragger...![]()
Phil
Sat Oct 12, 2024 7:47 am
Sun Oct 13, 2024 7:51 am