mike furline wrote:
PIMA
Thanks!
So, apparently there was a whole category of simulators that existed not for training, but for evaluation of potential flying candidates. These type of devices were mentioned in previous posts (
1,
2) and seemed to have existed to washout individuals who did not have the requisite skills - namely hand-eye-foot coordination - early in the flight training process. The South Australian Aviation Museum has a similar device that they call an "RAAF Aircrew Recruitment Test" that seems to involve keeping a white dot projected on a screen centered inside a reticle using a stick:

(Source:
South Australian Aviation Museum via Facebook)
Also, somewhat similar to the Link trainer comparison table included in a
previous post, I tried creating a table to explain the differences between the FAA categories of flight simulator based on the descriptions provided in a
Qualification and Approval section of the flight simulator Wikipedia article. The result is a bit of a mess in that it uses self-created terms, probably contains a number of errors, the categories may not be sufficiently delineated be readily mappable to a table and the table does not include a complete level of granularity (e.g. no "levels"). However, at the very least, it is useful in thinking about the various ways a flight simulator can be categorized:
Attachment:
Then I decided to try to lay it out a bit differently to emphasize the increasing requirements at each level. Again, this is simplified for the sake of explanation:
Attachment:
FAA Simulator Requirements Table.png [ 37.86 KiB | Viewed 3449 times ]
Lastly, it's worth noting that EASA has its own categories, but I didn't bother going into them.
_________________
Tri-State Warbird Museum Collections Manager & Museum Attendant
Warbird Philosophy Webmaster