Sun Sep 17, 2023 4:11 pm
Sun Sep 17, 2023 5:54 pm
Mon Sep 18, 2023 5:06 pm
Mon Sep 18, 2023 5:06 pm
Tue Sep 19, 2023 4:37 am
marine air wrote:He did a great job as it's sinking like a stone. I had a propellor failure in a factory new Maule M-7-235 several years ago while in the pattern and at the worst angle. We were dropping at 1800 feet per minute at best glide. I remember thinking, "We are going to roll this into a ball and will be lucky to live and it not burn. I was at the same angle and strong tailwind. The Maule landing gear can take punishment but you have to be tracking straight. This guy simply didn't have time to align the airplane, track straight before hitting. He was on grass. obviously.
Sat Sep 23, 2023 2:20 pm
EDMJ wrote:marine air wrote:He did a great job as it's sinking like a stone. I had a propellor failure in a factory new Maule M-7-235 several years ago while in the pattern and at the worst angle. We were dropping at 1800 feet per minute at best glide. I remember thinking, "We are going to roll this into a ball and will be lucky to live and it not burn. I was at the same angle and strong tailwind. The Maule landing gear can take punishment but you have to be tracking straight. This guy simply didn't have time to align the airplane, track straight before hitting. He was on grass. obviously.
Maybe I missed something, but was there a problem with the aircraft, and if so, what kind of problem? Or was it a misjudged landing?
Moreover, there's another video on Youtube of that aircraft making a successful landing from that very same approach. This seems to require flying a curved final through a gap in a row trees (!) in order to land on that runway, with no other approaches being possible due to surrounding trees and vegetation. If this is correct, is this a sensible way to operate such a rare aircraft?
Sat Sep 23, 2023 4:00 pm
reported an engine problem
Sat Sep 23, 2023 5:35 pm
old iron wrote:reported an engine problem
Hmm, Nieuport 17s (or 28s) had radios? Maybe this was too heavy?
Thu Sep 28, 2023 12:31 am
Fri Sep 29, 2023 11:12 am
Zac Yates wrote:Given the work put into its restoration this is very disappointing to see. I'm glad the pilot's okay and I hope repairs are possible and relatively cheap and simple.
Fri Sep 29, 2023 12:01 pm
Fri Sep 29, 2023 12:48 pm
Fri Sep 29, 2023 6:18 pm
StangStung wrote:Zac Yates wrote:Given the work put into its restoration this is very disappointing to see. I'm glad the pilot's okay and I hope repairs are possible and relatively cheap and simple.
Very little with airplanes is cheap or simple.
I was just at Old Rhinebeck a couple weeks ago and was talking to a volunteer there about the Albatros that wound up getting pranged. He said that was going to cost about $100k to fix. It looked a whole lot less damaged than this Nieuport.
Such a shame. It was a really pretty airplane.
Fri Sep 29, 2023 7:00 pm
old iron wrote:reported an engine problem
Hmm, Nieuport 17s (or 28s) had radios?
Sun Oct 01, 2023 3:38 pm
JohnB wrote:StangStung wrote:Zac Yates wrote:Given the work put into its restoration this is very disappointing to see. I'm glad the pilot's okay and I hope repairs are possible and relatively cheap and simple.
Very little with airplanes is cheap or simple.
I was just at Old Rhinebeck a couple weeks ago and was talking to a volunteer there about the Albatros that wound up getting pranged. He said that was going to cost about $100k to fix. It looked a whole lot less damaged than this Nieuport.
Such a shame. It was a really pretty airplane.
Not trying to minimize the accident, damage or cost of repairs, but the Nieuport might be easier to repair than the German ship due to design features.
A friend built a very accurate replica of a Sopwith and said it wasn't very difficult or expensive... but he had constructed a homebuilt and restored an award winning antique, so maybe it was easy for him.