Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri May 02, 2025 7:11 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jul 06, 2023 9:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 8:08 am
Posts: 247
Location: Arizona
There have been stories that some models of the Ju-87 Stuka had a "squid" or small explosive charge in the landing gear. In the event of an off-field landing, the gear could be jettisoned so as to prevent a "nose-over" landing.

Does anyone have any proof that this is true?

Thank you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 06, 2023 9:34 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:42 pm
Posts: 2707
Location: NP, NJ, USA
warbirdfinder wrote:
There have been stories that some models of the Ju-87 Stuka had a "squid" or small explosive charge in the landing gear. In the event of an off-field landing, the gear could be jettisoned so as to prevent a "nose-over" landing.

Does anyone have any proof that this is true?

Thank you.


I've only heard about that being planned for the carrier based variant.

_________________
Share your story: Rutgers Oral History Archive http://oralhistory.rutgers.edu/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 06, 2023 2:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 2:20 pm
Posts: 368
Location: UK
As the previous post, for the carrier-based version in case of ditching.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 06, 2023 5:06 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:43 pm
Posts: 1175
Location: Marietta, GA
warbirdfinder wrote:
There have been stories that some models of the Ju-87 Stuka had a "squid" or small explosive charge in the landing gear. In the event of an off-field landing, the gear could be jettisoned so as to prevent a "nose-over" landing.

Does anyone have any proof that this is true?

Thank you.


No indication it is true. But you may do better searching for the word "squib".


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2023 4:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 2:01 pm
Posts: 271
The Fi167 biplane torpedo bomber, intended for carrier use, certainly had provision to detach the landing gear in case of a ditching. This is perhaps where the detachable/explosive landing gear story comes from and has been transposed onto the Ju87?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2023 1:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2004 12:05 pm
Posts: 303
Location: Oklahoma City, OK.
This is really timely....I was watching the Smithsonian Channel's Air Warriors episode on the Ju-87 and there was a short clip of one landing next to troops in the field with no landing gear. I had to back it up several times and watch what I did not understand. How can a Stuka lose both gear at the same time, flack, cannon fire, mid-air collision? Maybe one but both?!?! This post explains what I was seeing. Possibly the prototype landing after blowing the gear? Check it out if you get a chance....looked like there was minimal damage to the airframe of the rugged beast.

_________________
Civis Aerius Sum

I am a citizen of the Air

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 25, 2023 4:11 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 3:45 pm
Posts: 2628
slinky wrote:
This is really timely....I was watching the Smithsonian Channel's Air Warriors episode on the Ju-87 and there was a short clip of one landing next to troops in the field with no landing gear. I had to back it up several times and watch what I did not understand. How can a Stuka lose both gear at the same time, flack, cannon fire, mid-air collision? Maybe one but both?!?! This post explains what I was seeing. Possibly the prototype landing after blowing the gear? Check it out if you get a chance....looked like there was minimal damage to the airframe of the rugged beast.


IIRC the Stuka pulled up late, both gear hit the water, ground, item and were torn off.

Image

_________________
45-47=-2


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 25, 2023 5:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 7:02 am
Posts: 334
Location: Up the Hill,Norwest from Brizzy
Ouch..Bet he had to change his pants after that.There was a story a whole flight of stukas dove into the ground during the war due to fog on the ground...

_________________
If the CO ask,s you to be Tail End Charlie...Just Shoot Him..A Piece of Cake


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 25, 2023 5:47 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 3:45 pm
Posts: 2628
Spitty wrote:
Ouch..Bet he had to change his pants after that.There was a story a whole flight of stukas dove into the ground during the war due to fog on the ground...


https://www.reddit.com/r/aviation/comme ... an_entire/

https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/wiki.php?id=67828

_________________
45-47=-2


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 25, 2023 9:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 11:44 am
Posts: 15
The Stuka photo attached above is a doctored propaganda image from the period. The actual photo has been shown with the Stuka retaining its landing gear. If this actually happened, then why is the mount for the trailing antenna still there?

Mark Proulx


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 25, 2023 4:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 7:02 am
Posts: 334
Location: Up the Hill,Norwest from Brizzy
mike furline wrote:
Spitty wrote:
Ouch..Bet he had to change his pants after that.There was a story a whole flight of stukas dove into the ground during the war due to fog on the ground...


https://www.reddit.com/r/aviation/comme ... an_entire/

https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/wiki.php?id=67828

Thanks mate thats the one...There was wreckage from that op was put together into a project...

_________________
If the CO ask,s you to be Tail End Charlie...Just Shoot Him..A Piece of Cake


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 300 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group