Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat May 10, 2025 6:05 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2022 9:04 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7802
... sure could have by the looks of these. Or they could be extra fuel tanks.
Photos state: C-47 with external tanks either with Napalm or gas at and over, New Guinea 1944.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

_________________
“Knowing what’s right, doesn’t mean much unless you do what’s right.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2022 9:24 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3410
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
The 30-ish R4D-6S aircraft were equipped with Depth Bombs in their Anti-Submarine role, but other than that, I don't believe any C-47/R4D were ever intentionally armed as conventional bombers. The racks in your photos are in the same position as on the R4D-6S, which were adapted from the ParaPack mount locations, so not surprised at all that they at least tested flying with drop tanks.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2022 10:44 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5595
Location: Eastern Washington
Not exactly a C-47, but Finland used a DC-2 as a bomber, as did someone in the Spanish civil war.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 16, 2022 5:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 3:13 pm
Posts: 427
Photo 3 and 4: isn't this the spare wing that was flown out to create the DC-2.5? That was suspended below a DC-3 to get it to the scene of the repair...

Edit: the suspension of that wing below a DC-3 is shown here: https://cnac.org/aircraft02.htm The photos above appear to show a different (slightly smaller) wing suspended in a similar way, using different and more brackets between (spare) wing root and DC-3 fuselage.

_________________
A Little VC10derness - A Tribute to the Vickers VC10 - www.VC10.net


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 16, 2022 7:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 7:30 am
Posts: 37
The photos show a 433rd TCG C-47 prior to that unit's transition to C-46s in October 1944. While I've never seen anything on that group's bombing activities, two C-47As (X87 and X89) of the 317th TCG (another Fifth AF transport unit) dropped 12 x 55 gallon drums of napalm each on Carabao Island on 12 April 1945. A second mission dropped another 24 drums later that day. During a third mission on 15 April, X84 dropped another 12 drums.

The drums were carried internally and pushed out the cargo door three at a time. A three-foot arming wire armed a grenade as the bombs fell away.

Many of my old microfilm scans are badly faded, but somewhere there's a note of the crews referring to their aircraft as CB-47s or BC-47s - wish I could find that note!

Cheers,


Dana


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 16, 2022 9:05 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:29 pm
Posts: 4525
Location: Dallas, TX
CAPFlyer wrote:
The 30-ish R4D-6S aircraft were equipped with Depth Bombs in their Anti-Submarine role, but other than that, I don't believe any C-47/R4D were ever intentionally armed as conventional bombers. The racks in your photos are in the same position as on the R4D-6S, which were adapted from the ParaPack mount locations, so not surprised at all that they at least tested flying with drop tanks.

Yep, and the CAF example at Lancaster is supposed to have sunk a u-boat with those depth charges.

_________________
Aerial Photographer with Red Wing Aerial Photography currently based at KRBD and tailwheel CFI.
Websites: Texas Tailwheel Flight Training, DoolittleRaid.com and Lbirds.com.

The horse is prepared against the day of battle: but safety is of the LORD. - Prov. 21:31 - Train, Practice, Trust.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 16, 2022 3:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 1:42 pm
Posts: 182
Location: Australia
The more you look at those photos the more interesting they get. As Dana said, an ex-70th TCS, 433rd TCG plane, judging by the overpainted "379". I'd lean toward those being extra fuel tanks, but I've never seen a 5th Air Force C-47 equipped quite like this before.

_________________
www.B17BlackJack.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 16, 2022 4:09 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7802
A couple more. Looks to be wings being transported.

Image

Image

_________________
“Knowing what’s right, doesn’t mean much unless you do what’s right.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 16, 2022 4:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 11:40 pm
Posts: 552
Location: Auckland, NZ
Lodestar wing being attached under a RNZAF Dakota in 1944 - flaps, who needs them!

https://rnzaf.proboards.com/post/303752/thread


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 16, 2022 9:19 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5663
Location: Minnesota, USA
RyanShort1 wrote:
Yep, and the CAF example at Lancaster is supposed to have sunk a u-boat with those depth charges.


A little history...

http://www.douglasdc3.com/r4d/r4d.htm

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 16, 2022 11:20 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:29 pm
Posts: 4525
Location: Dallas, TX
Dan K wrote:
RyanShort1 wrote:
Yep, and the CAF example at Lancaster is supposed to have sunk a u-boat with those depth charges.


A little history...

http://www.douglasdc3.com/r4d/r4d.htm

Ok. I'm going to be the bad guy and say it...

Which U-boat was it? What was the date? It seems elusive.

Also, while initially cruising through lost Uboats here: https://uboat.net/fates/losses/1942.htm I'm amazed at the high percentage of the Uboats sunk in 1942 were attributed to being sunk by a Lockheed Hudson!

_________________
Aerial Photographer with Red Wing Aerial Photography currently based at KRBD and tailwheel CFI.
Websites: Texas Tailwheel Flight Training, DoolittleRaid.com and Lbirds.com.

The horse is prepared against the day of battle: but safety is of the LORD. - Prov. 21:31 - Train, Practice, Trust.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 17, 2022 6:58 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3410
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
The official line is that the squadron that Ready4Duty was assigned to was credited with a U-Boat in Feb. 1945. As the R4D-6S service was highly classified, many of the records relating to day-to-day missions and assignments were either destroyed or just not well kept. As such, which of the 20 aircraft assigned to the squadron actually made the attack credited with the kill was responsible, other records show that BuNo 50783 (now "Ready4Duty") was flying that day, in the same general vicinity (one of 2 aircraft assigned to the patrol area). There are photos in the Smithsonian showing the attack and presumed sinking, however none show which BuNo they were taken from (again due to wartime censorship practices).

The 2003 edition of Texas Warbird Survivors has a little more -

https://books.google.com/books?id=ZLE2U ... gs&f=false


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 17, 2022 7:55 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:29 pm
Posts: 4525
Location: Dallas, TX
CAPFlyer wrote:
The official line is that the squadron that Ready4Duty was assigned to was credited with a U-Boat in Feb. 1945. As the R4D-6S service was highly classified, many of the records relating to day-to-day missions and assignments were either destroyed or just not well kept. As such, which of the 20 aircraft assigned to the squadron actually made the attack credited with the kill was responsible, other records show that BuNo 50783 (now "Ready4Duty") was flying that day, in the same general vicinity (one of 2 aircraft assigned to the patrol area). There are photos in the Smithsonian showing the attack and presumed sinking, however none show which BuNo they were taken from (again due to wartime censorship practices).

The 2003 edition of Texas Warbird Survivors has a little more -

https://books.google.com/books?id=ZLE2U ... gs&f=false

That's what I was looking for! Thanks.

_________________
Aerial Photographer with Red Wing Aerial Photography currently based at KRBD and tailwheel CFI.
Websites: Texas Tailwheel Flight Training, DoolittleRaid.com and Lbirds.com.

The horse is prepared against the day of battle: but safety is of the LORD. - Prov. 21:31 - Train, Practice, Trust.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2022 6:00 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 2:38 pm
Posts: 2662
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
They were used as bombers by the Israelis in their fight for independence 1947- 1948.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2022 8:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 2:33 am
Posts: 19
JohnB wrote:
Not exactly a C-47, but Finland used a DC-2 as a bomber, as did someone in the Spanish civil war.


True, but the Finnish use was limited to one mission during the Winter War, on 1st March 1940. On return flight one of the engines had to be shut down due to mechanical failure, no enemy action involved, and the aircraft (the only DC-2 in Finnish AF at the time) was grounded for a longish time. After it was repaired it was used for aerial photo survey/reconnaissance duties, and as a transport aircraft and troop carrier. After the war, Finnish AF bought two ex Aero Oy (now Finnnair) DC-2s, and used them until 1956.

The Soviet AF did use the licence built DC-3, Lisunov Li-2, as bomber. Somebody else may know better how extensive that use was.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 345 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group