Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 3:39 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jan 02, 2022 8:20 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 8:54 am
Posts: 3331
The Seafire hasn’t flown for about 15 years now I think it would need a little more than just an annual to put it back in the air after sitting for so long.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 04, 2022 8:38 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 2:38 pm
Posts: 2662
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
It seems to be a very nice choice of aircraft for the collection. I'd like to point out that he owns the T-33 that has an engine conversion. Ezell Aviation converted it to a Garrett TFE 731-3 turbofan. It would be nice to get a pilot report on how it flies with the turbofan as far as takeoff performance and it's major fuel savings. The fuel consumption is a huge negative on owning a T-33.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 04, 2022 1:01 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 12:28 pm
Posts: 1199
marine air wrote:
It seems to be a very nice choice of aircraft for the collection. I'd like to point out that he owns the T-33 that has an engine conversion. Ezell Aviation converted it to a Garrett TFE 731-3 turbofan. It would be nice to get a pilot report on how it flies with the turbofan as far as takeoff performance and it's major fuel savings. The fuel consumption is a huge negative on owning a T-33.


I would like to hear about the turbofan conversion also. I have read elsewhere that a T-33 conversion might be the easiest way to get a P/F-80 representative into the air. The main fuselage plug that added the second seat is a fairly straightforward constant chord 24 inch plug I understand. The rear fuselage plug could likely be ignored. So "all" you need is a plug delete, new canopy, P-80 wingtips for a P-80 representative, but the turbofan would be icing on the cake. No where is my lottery ticket......


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 04, 2022 4:18 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
marine air wrote:
The fuel consumption is a huge negative on owning a T-33.
The fuel cost is negligible compared to buying a P-51 though. You could burn several million dollars worth of fuel in the T-33 before you even got close to the cost of a flyable Mustang.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 04, 2022 4:32 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:43 pm
Posts: 1175
Location: Marietta, GA
bdk wrote:
marine air wrote:
The fuel consumption is a huge negative on owning a T-33.
The fuel cost is negligible compared to buying a P-51 though. You could burn several million dollars worth of fuel in the T-33 before you even got close to the cost of a flyable Mustang.


Only if you have several million dollars to spend on fuel. ;-)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 04, 2022 8:31 pm 
Offline
KiwiZac
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 12:33 am
Posts: 1466
Location: Blenheim, NZ
Thank you for sharing the photos, I'm afraid I only have eyes for the Seafire - although it's neat to see an Inflatoplane!

_________________
Zac in NZ
#avgeek, modelbuilder, photographer, writer. Callsign: "HANDBAG".
https://linktr.ee/zacyates

"It's his plane, he spent the money to restore it, he can do with it what he wants. I will never understand what's hard to comprehend about this." - kalamazookid, 20/08/2013
"The more time you spend around warbirds the sooner you learn nothing, is simple." - JohnB, 24/02/22


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 05, 2022 10:39 am 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
Kyleb wrote:
bdk wrote:
marine air wrote:
The fuel consumption is a huge negative on owning a T-33.
The fuel cost is negligible compared to buying a P-51 though. You could burn several million dollars worth of fuel in the T-33 before you even got close to the cost of a flyable Mustang.


Only if you have several million dollars to spend on fuel. ;-)
About 360 gallons per hour I believe. Jet A is $3.89/gal at Chino, so ~ $1,400/hour, so you could probably fly about 1,500 hours in your T-33. Likely just under 1,000 hours in your F-86 (~560 GPH?).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2022 12:03 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5614
Location: Eastern Washington
marine air wrote:
It seems to be a very nice choice of aircraft for the collection. I'd like to point out that he owns the T-33 that has an engine conversion. Ezell Aviation converted it to a Garrett TFE 731-3 turbofan. It would be nice to get a pilot report on how it flies with the turbofan as far as takeoff performance and it's major fuel savings. The fuel consumption is a huge negative on owning a T-33.



I didn't know a 731 would fit in a T-Bird.
Off the top of my head, I would have thought it would be too wide.
I was around when Ezell was working on a Temco Pinto...adding tip tanks, I think it was already a Super Pinto (with a later GE Lear engine, IIRC).

Wonder what the overhaul costs for a 731 are compared to the ancient T-33 unit?

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.


Last edited by JohnB on Fri Jan 07, 2022 11:17 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2022 9:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:02 am
Posts: 163
Location: Pearland, TX
The display sign from the photos say it actually has a GE CF-700 installed. Thrust is basically identical, but the CF-700 weighs 735 lbs compared to the J-33's nearly 2000.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2022 11:16 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5614
Location: Eastern Washington
I'll mention that to John Sessions at Historic Flight Foundation. He has a T-33 (or Canadian Silver Star) under long term restoration. It would be neat to have it re-engined.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 290 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group