JohnB wrote:
In addition to the reason given above, I've been told that the tail rotor is most often used to push the fuselage to the left to counteract main rotor torque...and the blades worked better "pushing" rather than "pulling".
Can't speak for all helo's other than the ones I worked and flew on. I started out on the old H-52's then went to the H-65's, then H-60's then back to H-65's. The T/R will normally push/hold/pull the tail boom based on pedal input to counteract MRH torque. As I recall, on the H-65.....once the airspeed hits 47kts, the airframe will hold direction of flt without T/R (fenestron) input due to the vert fin canted design. I think the H-60's will too above a certain A/S. I don't think the H-52's had that aerodynamic technology in them.
The pushing vs pulling efficiency makes some sense. I'm guessing it is less stress on the airframe and components too. However all T/R's will push and pull regardless of what side they're on. Another "as I recall"....when doing T/R rigging/range checks, there was slightly more pedal authority (in degrees) in one direction vs the other based on direction of rotation of MRH. I'm pulling all of this out of the mental archives so take it for what it's worth.