Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 3:21 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jun 03, 2020 2:42 pm 
Offline
WRG Editor
WRG Editor
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 5614
Location: Somerset, MA & Johnston, RI
    Delivered to the United States Air Force.
    Assigned to 310th Bomb Wing.
    Withdrawn from use.
    Scrapped, after 1971.

Image

Anybody have any further information?

_________________
Scott Rose
Editor-In-Chief/Webmaster
Warbirds Resource Group - Warbird Information Exchange - Warbird Registry

Be civil, be polite, be nice.... or be elsewhere.
-------------------------------------------------------
This site is brought to you with the support of members like you. If you find this site to be of value to you,
consider supporting this forum and the Warbirds Resource Group with a VOLUNTARY subscription
For as little as $2/month you can help ($2 x 12 = $24/year, less than most magazine subscriptions)
So If you like it here, and want to see it grow, consider helping out.


Image

Thanks to everyone who has so generously supported the site. We really do appreciate it.

Follow us on Twitter! @WIXHQ


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 11:44 pm
Posts: 255
"He's dead, Jim."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 9:08 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5614
Location: Eastern Washington
According to the excellent 2018 Book The Boeing B-47 Stratojet, SAC's Transitional Bomber by Habermahl and Hopkins, 52-0281 was delivered in 1954 and out of service by May 1959...well ahead of its sister ships.

However, it does not appear in the list of losses (which seems to include ground write-offs from fires and the like), so we don't know how it came to be withdrawn from service.
Perhaps corrosion or a overdressed airframe from a storm or bad landing?
The 1959 date is before the milk bottle pin wing attach problems, so it wasn't found not to worth repairing from that issue.I

Judging by the pickups in the background, the photo is from the mid-60s or later.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 10:58 pm 
Offline
WRG Editor
WRG Editor
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 5614
Location: Somerset, MA & Johnston, RI
The photog is under the impression it was grounded after a bad landing, but wasn't 100% positive

_________________
Scott Rose
Editor-In-Chief/Webmaster
Warbirds Resource Group - Warbird Information Exchange - Warbird Registry

Be civil, be polite, be nice.... or be elsewhere.
-------------------------------------------------------
This site is brought to you with the support of members like you. If you find this site to be of value to you,
consider supporting this forum and the Warbirds Resource Group with a VOLUNTARY subscription
For as little as $2/month you can help ($2 x 12 = $24/year, less than most magazine subscriptions)
So If you like it here, and want to see it grow, consider helping out.


Image

Thanks to everyone who has so generously supported the site. We really do appreciate it.

Follow us on Twitter! @WIXHQ


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 11:33 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5614
Location: Eastern Washington
Scott
That sounds right...a bad landing where something was stressed/bent would not be listed as a crash but it would likely still could be considered a Class A mishap. At any rate, there would be some paperwork involved to account for one less bomber.

If the WFU date in the book is correct, they sure kept it around awhile if it wasn't scrapped until after 1971. Certainly there was no reason to keep it around past 1968 as a parts source.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 06, 2020 12:19 am 
Offline
WRG Editor
WRG Editor
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 5614
Location: Somerset, MA & Johnston, RI
JohnB wrote:
Scott
That sounds right...a bad landing where something was stressed/bent would not be listed as a crash but it would likely still could be considered a Class A mishap. At any rate, there would be some paperwork involved to account for one less bomber.

If the WFU date in the book is correct, they sure kept it around awhile if it wasn't scrapped until after 1971. Certainly there was no reason to keep it around past 1968 as a parts source.


The original caption (which I forgot to include) says this pic was taken in the fire training pit.

_________________
Scott Rose
Editor-In-Chief/Webmaster
Warbirds Resource Group - Warbird Information Exchange - Warbird Registry

Be civil, be polite, be nice.... or be elsewhere.
-------------------------------------------------------
This site is brought to you with the support of members like you. If you find this site to be of value to you,
consider supporting this forum and the Warbirds Resource Group with a VOLUNTARY subscription
For as little as $2/month you can help ($2 x 12 = $24/year, less than most magazine subscriptions)
So If you like it here, and want to see it grow, consider helping out.


Image

Thanks to everyone who has so generously supported the site. We really do appreciate it.

Follow us on Twitter! @WIXHQ


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 06, 2020 2:25 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 2:02 am
Posts: 4701
Location: Yucca Valley, CA
Does the photographer remember in what city/state this was taken? Must have been fairly accessible to get that graffiti on it - and somebody cared enough to paint over it. :?

_________________
Image
All right, Mister Dorfmann, start pullin'!
Pilot: "Flap switch works hard in down position."
Mechanic: "Flap switch checked OK. Pilot needs more P.T." - Flight report, TB-17G 42-102875 (Hobbs AAF)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MKD1966 and 301 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group