Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Mon Jun 23, 2025 8:07 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2018 9:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:23 am
Posts: 699
In a new book that I am reviewing for Aviation History Magazine, the author claims that the term "Dakota" for wartime British C-47s is not the name of a Native American tribe but an acronym that comes from the phrase "Douglas Aircraft COmpany Transport Aircraft," i.e. DACOTA, which was simplified to Dakota.

I have never heard this, but the author is Walter Boyne, one of the most respected of all American aviation historians. Can anybody confirm that Walt is correct?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2018 10:44 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3413
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
The Brits were fond of using Alliteration in their naming conventions for land-based aircraft, so they needed a name that started with a "D" to follow suit when they began acquiring the DC-3/C-47 via Lend-Lease. The US had named the aircraft the "Skytrain", but that didn't work for the Brits so the story goes that they found a happy accident - an Acronym that was also a good name DACoTA. I've found at least 4 other references online to this source for "Dakota" with variations on this story. How "correct" that story is will remain to be seen, but it does at least seem to be a plausible one.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2018 11:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 3:02 pm
Posts: 302
The British used many American place names for the American aircraft they used. Boston, Hudson, Maryland, Baltimore, Catalina, Ventura, Bermuda, and quite a few more. Dakota fits right in with all these- and you can't expect the Brits to have known the difference between North and South Dakota (if indeed there is any).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2018 11:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 11:40 pm
Posts: 554
Location: Auckland, NZ
I have to agree with the esteemed posters on Key some years ago - most likely is back-formation after Dakota was assigned based on a location and alliteration.
https://forum.keypublishing.com/showthr ... -come-from


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2018 9:59 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:23 am
Posts: 699
Errol, I think you're right. The acronym business simply seemed too neat. (And if they did want to go with an acronym, why didn't they call it the Dacota?)

I was aware that the official Boeing site uses the acronym story, but that means little. That paragraph could have been written--probably was written--by some 25-year-old intern in the PR department who had never even seen a DC-3, much less a Dakota...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2018 3:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 6:54 pm
Posts: 34
Location: Green Bay, WI
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2018 5:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 11:57 am
Posts: 168
And the training aircraft,Harvard ,Yale ,and Cornell


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: H.Finn, Rod Schneider and 46 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group