Sun Mar 11, 2018 10:24 pm
Mon Mar 12, 2018 12:33 am
CoastieJohn wrote:I located a vid last night showing what looked like a side number "8"-T-7 taking off. Again....not sure about schemes and numbers either. Smarter guys will have to address that aspect.
Mon Mar 12, 2018 12:38 am
Kyleb wrote:I'm with you on this. Definitely a composite using several scans. I don't think you can get this level of detail from a wider swath scan.
Mon Mar 12, 2018 8:45 am
Mon Mar 12, 2018 10:31 am
lucky52 wrote:Please correct me if I'm wrong on this.It looks like the early paint scheme had a small insignia and the squadron number, a T. and then the plane number.These TBDs have a large insignia with only the T and the plane number with the squadron number left off.I wonder if this was expediting the repainting or they didn't"t want the squadron number on there for some other reason.In the big scheme of things it doesn't matter, just curious.
Mon Mar 12, 2018 10:42 am
Mon Mar 12, 2018 6:09 pm
Mon Mar 12, 2018 6:34 pm
Mon Mar 12, 2018 6:51 pm
Mon Mar 12, 2018 7:07 pm
Tue Mar 13, 2018 3:08 am
Tue Mar 13, 2018 8:07 am
Tue Mar 13, 2018 8:47 am
Tue Mar 13, 2018 9:11 am
Tue Mar 13, 2018 10:14 am
Mark Allen M wrote:I'd also suggest not to jump too far ahead in any conclusions about who's F4F is sitting down there. So far Gayler is the lead conclusion and the last video posted by JFS61 clearly shows an F-5 F4F taxiing out. Whether it's the same F-5 as what is sitting on the ocean floor is still up for debate and what number was painted out to add that F-5 is still uncertain. No concrete proof yet just speculation. Hopefully we'll see a shot of the buNo on that particular F4F.
Gotta wait and see what other proof may show up before claiming 'solved'. I'd hate for this thread to turn into another of those AE debates that turns sour with too many people thinking they have it solved before it's solved. Like I stated, more photos are coming that just may answer some questions decisively. Fun stuff though.