Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Jun 28, 2025 7:42 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 10:20 pm
Posts: 435
Isn't this the only U.S. upper power turret of WW2 with only one gun?

A. Why only one machine gun instead of two?
B. Why was it on the left, instead of in the center or on the right?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:47 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3293
Location: Phoenix, Az
george wrote:
Isn't this the only U.S. upper power turret of WW2 with only one gun?


I think it is, at least on a combat plane.

george wrote:
A. Why only one machine gun instead of two?

not enough room for 2, there is more than just the gun, there is also the ammo storage to deal with

george wrote:
B. Why was it on the left, instead of in the center or on the right?

ever been inside a TBM ? there is not much room, and the only clear zone to the turret is on the right side

_________________
Matt Gunsch, A&P, IA, Warbird maint and restorations
Jack, You have Debauched my sloth !!!!!!
We tried voting with the Ballot box, When do we start voting from the Ammo box, and am I allowed only one vote ?
Check out the Ercoupe Discussion Group on facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 06, 2015 11:22 am 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 11471
Location: Salem, Oregon
Quote:
Why was it on the left, instead of in the center ?

Would you ever want to be so cramped and strattling a M2. With every
round fired your voice's pitch would get higher and higher! :shock:

_________________
Don't touch my junk!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 06, 2015 11:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 10:20 pm
Posts: 435
Thanks for the answers, Matt. I knew there were reasons for only one gun and its location, just didn't know what those reasons were. No, I don't believe I have been in an Avenger and didn't know how the gunner got in and out of the turret.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 06, 2015 12:42 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:11 pm
Posts: 1559
Location: Damascus, MD
Access to the turret takes a little bit of mobility. There is a piece of armor plate that needs to be lowered and then you hoist yourself up into the seat. The radioman would then put the armor back in place. Once in the turret, the seat itself is remarkably comfortable, you have a great field of vision, except to your left. Some call it "the best seat in the house" on a TBM. The turret was controlled by a pistol-grip like device which controlled rotation and the guns elevation.

It's a much better place to ride than in the radio compartment, although you do get a nice view below and to the rear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:39 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5664
Location: Minnesota, USA
george wrote:
Isn't this the only U.S. upper power turret of WW2 with only one gun?...



The B-18 went to war with this bad boy...not familiar with the designer or power system.


Image




The TBY-2 Sea Wolf was on its way to the combat zone when the war ended abruptly. The turret on the production run was the Vought-Sikorsky 150CH-3...a design sure to stump even the most jaded of turret experts. Although no complete example is known to exist, I'm hoping to eventually piece enough of one back together to call it the sole survivor.



Image

Image

Image

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 06, 2015 7:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 1:14 am
Posts: 111
Alright, this begs a question here.

Turret nuts all know that the first powered turret was on the Boulton Paul Overstrand. But, what about in the US?

I've heard the B-18 listed as such, but from what pictures I've seen it's doesn't look like it was powered. I know the B-17 didn't receive a powered turret until 1940. So, who was the first in the US?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 06, 2015 9:12 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
I remember as a kid building a few tbm's & always ruined them trying to connect the turret to the rear canopy without knowing there was an open gap between the two. after I ruined a few they all were shot down via firecrackers or the bb gun.

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 06, 2015 11:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:25 pm
Posts: 522
Location: Travis AFB
This TBM Turret cutaway diagram should help explain
Aloha


Attachments:
tbm cutaway.jpg
tbm cutaway.jpg [ 135.13 KiB | Viewed 1587 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 06, 2015 11:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:25 pm
Posts: 522
Location: Travis AFB
And this photo shows man inside


Attachments:
turrent2 edit.jpg
turrent2 edit.jpg [ 130.53 KiB | Viewed 1586 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2015 12:37 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 10:28 pm
Posts: 455
Location: New Zealand
tom d. friedman wrote:
connect the turret to the rear canopy without knowing there was an open gap between the two.

Not to wrong though Tom as I've seen photos of the XTBF (and possibly a few early production TBFs?) with a little perspex "lip" fairing in the gap at the top of the rear canopy to just about touching the turret.
I copied this photo of either the XTBF or an early TBF on it's nose from the WIX thread here: http://www.warbirdinformationexchange.o ... hilit=Dzus

You can see the little extra bit just forward of the turret near the top of the greenhouse.
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2015 1:00 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:11 pm
Posts: 1559
Location: Damascus, MD
TheBigBadGman wrote:
Alright, this begs a question here.

Turret nuts all know that the first powered turret was on the Boulton Paul Overstrand. But, what about in the US?

I've heard the B-18 listed as such, but from what pictures I've seen it's doesn't look like it was powered. I know the B-17 didn't receive a powered turret until 1940. So, who was the first in the US?


Actually, the B-17E was the first model Fortress with a power turret. It's first flight was Sept. 5, 1941

With the possible exception of the B-18, I'm thinking the first American plane with a power turret was the B-26. While the B-25 flew before the B-26, the prototype did not have a power turret. The first B-26 off the line did.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2015 1:22 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 2:02 am
Posts: 4702
Location: Yucca Valley, CA
Sorry if I'm guessing the obvious, but was the TBF turret designed as it was because they figured most gunners would be right-handed?

_________________
Image
All right, Mister Dorfmann, start pullin'!
Pilot: "Flap switch works hard in down position."
Mechanic: "Flap switch checked OK. Pilot needs more P.T." - Flight report, TB-17G 42-102875 (Hobbs AAF)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2015 5:36 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 10:28 pm
Posts: 455
Location: New Zealand
Chris that's a good question and most likely correct.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2015 7:21 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3293
Location: Phoenix, Az
Chris Brame wrote:
Sorry if I'm guessing the obvious, but was the TBF turret designed as it was because they figured most gunners would be right-handed?

No, it is because navy aircraft were to be entered from the right side, as it was the side faceing the ships island

_________________
Matt Gunsch, A&P, IA, Warbird maint and restorations
Jack, You have Debauched my sloth !!!!!!
We tried voting with the Ballot box, When do we start voting from the Ammo box, and am I allowed only one vote ?
Check out the Ercoupe Discussion Group on facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Erik Thingbo, Google [Bot] and 39 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group