Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Jun 19, 2025 12:24 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 2:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2010 11:16 am
Posts: 90
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Hi Everyone,
Hi Everyone,

If this question has been posted before, my apologies. My understanding is that there was no difference in wing thickness between the P-51D and P-51B/C. Some books make reference to a thicker wing on the D which allowed for the guns to be mounted upright. However, others indicate that this was not true. Does anyone have a definitive answer?

Also, does anyone have a copy of Robert W. Gruenhagen's book P-51 Mustang? How does he cover this subject? I think I read somewhere that even he indicated that the P-51D wing was thicker. I can't seem to find my copy of his book right now to check. I think his book is generally regarded as one of the bests book on the P-51 published. If anyone has a copy, could they scan and post the page that references this subject, or advise what he states in his book?

Thanks.

Ron


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 3:36 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 8:54 am
Posts: 3331
The thickness was the same.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 4:37 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:40 pm
Posts: 1471
I cant site any references off the top of my head but I did a great deal of research on the Mustang while I was drawing plans for a 1/4 scale model of the airplane. I can tell you without hesitation that their was no change in the thickness of the wing on any of the Mustangs with the possible exception of the H and the other light weight test aircraft. (I did not research those variants but the wing was obviously different in planform.) Well known Mustang historian Charles Neeley, whose scale drawings I used for my design work, also confirmed this for me. Charlie has forgotten more about Mustangs than I ever knew in the first place and I trust his research.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 6:23 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:51 pm
Posts: 1185
Location: Chandler, AZ
When the six gun wing was designed the guns were set 'normal' to the wing - ie at 90deg to the dihedral angle. The four gun wing had the guns set vertical compared to the ground. This meant that there was more of an angle compared to the ammo feed on the four-gun, and the guns took up more 'vertical' space in the wing

_________________
Lest Hero-worship raise it's head and cloud our vision, remember that World War II was fought and won by the same sort of twenty-something punks we wouldn't let our daughters date.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:02 pm 
Offline
Newly minted Mustang Pilot
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 1441
Location: Everywhere
The question was raised on Facebook last year in the Mustang group...Chris Fahey opened up the ammo bays of the POF "A", Boise Bee "C" and I think Spam Can or Wee Willy "D"...and with a ruler in the photo they all matched.

Jim

_________________
www.spiritof44.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 09, 2015 6:09 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 8:47 pm
Posts: 31
From the X73 to the D model, the basic wing ordinates are the same. The expanded leading edge inboard of the gear differs.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 09, 2015 8:15 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5664
Location: Minnesota, USA
shrike wrote:
When the six gun wing was designed the guns were set 'normal' to the wing - ie at 90deg to the dihedral angle. The four gun wing had the guns set vertical compared to the ground. This meant that there was more of an angle compared to the ammo feed on the four-gun, and the guns took up more 'vertical' space in the wing




P-51B/C


Image



P-51D


Image

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 09, 2015 2:48 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:51 pm
Posts: 1185
Location: Chandler, AZ
Wow. Those are canted over even further than I was led to believe. No wonder they were prone to feed problems.
I wonder what idjit designed that set-up? (or to be fair, I wonder what other engineering criteria there were that led to such a sub-optimal installation)

_________________
Lest Hero-worship raise it's head and cloud our vision, remember that World War II was fought and won by the same sort of twenty-something punks we wouldn't let our daughters date.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 258 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group