Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sun Jun 22, 2025 2:28 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Pot Stirrer...
PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2014 3:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 2:24 pm
Posts: 819
Location: San Angelo, Texas
Hmmm...The French Navy recently retired their F-8s. Availability? Also, the Luftwaffe F-4Fs are being phased out. Then there's the Italian Air Force F-104S's. Hows about an F-101 Voodoo (Canada, mebbee?) Heard there was a RAF Tornado F3 for sale, as well...

_________________
Bob


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pot Stirrer...
PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 8:50 am
Posts: 17
What would the Board think is the most modern military jet in civilian hands?

my guess:

Art's Sea Harrier
Collins F-4 Phantom
the 3 or 4 restored and updated A4's flying.
the T-38s and F-5s flying
The 2 or 3 Mig 29's.

I think the list above contains aircraft that are currently in military inventories flying or have just recently been phased out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pot Stirrer...
PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:36 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3413
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
Don't forget the Cold War Air Museum has 2x Mi-24D's (which the Bulgarians were flying until just before their sale and are still flying the Mi-24V and F) and 2x Mi-2's (which are still operational with many militaries). I don't remember the age on their MiG-23UB, but it might be newer than the Collings F-4D by a couple years. There's also 2 other MiG-23's flying in the US, of which one I know is a 80's model, so definitely newer.

None of the CWAM aircraft have operational radars as far as I'm aware and I don't think either of the flying MiG-23's have them either as they were trainers and the operators removed the radars even before they were sold into private hands.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pot Stirrer...
PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2014 3:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 2:24 pm
Posts: 819
Location: San Angelo, Texas
a couple of Su-27s were sold in the US in recent years and are (were) registered to Meridican, Inc. of Delaware..

_________________
Bob


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pot Stirrer...
PostPosted: Sun Nov 02, 2014 5:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 6:20 am
Posts: 83
Some good suggestions so far, with many types that I would love to see flying (again) some day.
I've often wondered why, with the dozens of F-84's preserved or stored around the world, no one seems to be trying to return one to flying condition. Marginal power and lots of magnesium/corrosion problems, I've been told.

For some really out-of-the-box hopes: when Romania retired its H-5's (Chinese Il-28 copies) about 10 years ago, I was sure some US enthusiast would buy the survivors and put one on the display circuit. Likewise when the PLAAF retired its J6's (MiG-19 copies) and Q5's. So... who is going to surprise us? :)

(To be slightly more realistic, I'm just hoping I will get the chance to see the Collings F-105, one of the El Paso, TX F-106's, or the Stennis, MS Lightning fly during my lifetime.)

Roger


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pot Stirrer...
PostPosted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 2:42 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
Fouga or L-29 would be most inexpensive to buy and operate.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pot Stirrer...
PostPosted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 7:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 12:12 am
Posts: 613
Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
bdk wrote:
Fouga or L-29 would be most inexpensive to buy and operate.

The first part is correct... the second is not. we have 4 parked at our field that once made up a jet team and as soon as fuel started to go up in the mid 2000's, they became too expensive to operate.

_________________
Tyler Pinkerton
Active Member of Air Heritage Inc. of Beaver Falls, PA.
Aircraft: C47B, C-123K, Fairchild F-24, Funk Model B, L-21B, T-28B, T-34B
Static: F-4C Phantom II, F-15A, T-3 Provost


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: brian-livingston, Google Adsense [Bot] and 66 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group