Fri Feb 24, 2006 1:51 pm
Mon Mar 06, 2006 2:02 pm
srpatterson wrote:ThinkingManNeil wrote:Those are amazing photo's, but I don't think stunts like that are very clever or helpful to aviation. All it would take is for one of those guys to sneeze and they'd be a stain on the intrument panel, and a perfectly good warbird would likely be destroyed in the process.
And taking passengers along is none too bright either; I wonder if he knew they were going to do this?
Skilled, professional aerobatics is one thing; this was a dangerous stunt with less than no room for error that easily could've ended in tragedy and a blackeye for the warbird movement.
N.
Well, not exactly correct...
This is one of those tricks that looks far worse than it actually is. It's been done many many times before, using lots of different types of aircraft (Cubs, T-6s, a Skyraider would be cool but the aircraft type really doesn't matter as long as it's convention gear). As for skill, well it's a wheel landing so I guess you have to be able to do one of those. Give yourself a decent run in, arrest your sink rate and skim her on. Once on the water you cannot push the plane in. It's just like being on concrete. There's a great stretch of the Missouri River near Kansas City that's seen this done more than a few times.
Cool that it's a 4 ship, but again not the hardest trick in the book. Basically a 4 ship section landing. Once on the water all you need is rudder and power to maintain position in the flight.
Sorry Neil, a sneeze wouldn't have guaranteed a crash, just like a sneeze during takeoff or landing is not a guaranteed crash. The risks shown here are no greater (and substantially less) than during a normal 4 ship formation flight, and MUCH less than during a 4 ship aerobatic routine.
Just wish I had thought of it first. The four ship element is SH.
Mon Mar 06, 2006 5:44 pm
Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:07 pm
Sat Sep 22, 2007 10:57 am
Sun Sep 23, 2007 12:58 am