This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Post a reply

P-63 with Vee tail

Sat Apr 05, 2014 11:01 am

Stumbled across this today and have never seen it before. Obviously a modded P-63 but does anybody have any more info?

Image

Re: P-63 with Vee tail

Sat Apr 05, 2014 11:23 am

Scott, it appears it was just an experiment on a "Pinball" P-63.

RP-63G: "Pinball" target aircraft. Two prototypes (modified P-63Cs, s/ns 43-11723/11724) and thirty production aircraft (s/ns 45-57283 - 45-57312). 1,200hp Allison V-1710-135 engine. Another 420 cancelled. One experimentally fitted with V-shaped tail assembly.
Jerry

Re: P-63 with Vee tail

Sat Apr 05, 2014 9:27 pm

I think Tex Johnston flew it once, and said never again, it flew pretty bad I guess.

Re: P-63 with Vee tail

Sat Apr 05, 2014 9:49 pm

There was also a swept wing version
Image

Re: P-63 with Vee tail

Sun Apr 06, 2014 6:24 am

The V-tail was an idea that got some traction during the war as a way to save weight. It was first suggested by a Polish engineer in a 1932 paper.
Obviously we know it was never widely used.
The V-tail P-63 first flew in December 1945...the same time as the Bonanza took to the air. Two were modified and at least one survived long enough to receive USAF (as opposed to USAAF) markings in 1947.

Oddly, Beech beat Bell with the configuration. Beech tested a V-tail on a AT-10 in 1943 during research for high speed aircraft. As aircraft were getting faster, it was found that a V-tail mounted high on the rear fuselage would take the horizontal tail surfaces out of wake of the wing. Beech research suggested that sizes being equal, a V configuration gave 40% greater control effectiveness over a conventional unit. On the first Bonanzas, Beech said the design saved 11.6 pounds and contributed to a reduction in drag. Beech also found that a V-tail made the aircraft more resistant to enter a spin and better spin recovery.

At the launch of the Bonanza in 1947, Beech said all its future designs would use it, none did except the Twin Quad feederliner prototype. Beech did consider the V-tail for the T-34.

The only other type with the feature to reach large scale production was the French Magister jet trainer which arrived shortly after the Bonanza (1951).

Re: P-63 with Vee tail

Sun Apr 06, 2014 8:36 am

Bf 109v48 (WkNr:14003 - VJ+WC, an early G-0) was fitted with a V-tail.
A report dated 22MAR43 indicated an increase in top speed of only 2.5kph, not sufficient enough to justify proceeding.

Re: P-63 with Vee tail

Sun Apr 06, 2014 12:05 pm

shrike wrote:Bf 109v48 (WkNr:14003 - VJ+WC, an early G-0) was fitted with a V-tail.
A report dated 22MAR43 indicated an increase in top speed of only 2.5kph, not sufficient enough to justify proceeding.



More to the point, it probably wasn't worth disrupting production for the mod. Also, one wonders how the pilots would have felt about the change?

Re: P-63 with Vee tail

Sun Apr 06, 2014 5:07 pm

Okay,
1) That V-tail doesn't look nearly large enough for the rest of the airplane, hp. etc. The V-tails Bonanzas I've flown have a very subtle oscillation on the vertical axis, it must have been very pronounced on that prototype.
2) The swept wing P-63 was supposed to be the wing design to be used on the then future F-86A. That aircraft is supposed to be in storage in at the Smithsonian. It probably was much faster than the stock P-63's. Ever noticed how fat and non-laminar the wing is on a P-63? Very primitive wing shape compared to the rest of the sleek aircraft.

Re: P-63 with Vee tail

Sun Apr 06, 2014 5:39 pm

JohnB wrote:
shrike wrote:Bf 109v48 (WkNr:14003 - VJ+WC, an early G-0) was fitted with a V-tail.
A report dated 22MAR43 indicated an increase in top speed of only 2.5kph, not sufficient enough to justify proceeding.



More to the point, it probably wasn't worth disrupting production for the mod. Also, one wonders how the pilots would have felt about the change?



Given the constant variations and evolution of the 109 airframe it probably could have been incorporated without too much disruption, just like the taller tail and ERLA hood were.
If it had given a marked performance advantage over the conventional tail, the pilots would have given it a putzig nickname, and the Experten would have argued about how much nicer the old one was, but the advantage would have been gratefully accepted.

Re: P-63 with Vee tail

Sun Apr 06, 2014 9:22 pm

The wing was redesigned again, this time with new NACA laminar flow airfoils. The wing of the P-63 was designed with a NACA 66(215)-116 a=.6 at the root and a NACA 66(215)-216 a=.6 at the tip. The wing taper ratio was approximately 2:1, span was 38 ft, 4 inches and the area was 248 square ft.[
"Wikipedia"


The P-63 was fitted with a laminar flow wing.

Basically heavy and underpowered...

PS: This is what I'm referring that was stated earlier!

Ever noticed how fat and non-laminar the wing is on a P-63? Very primitive wing shape compared to the rest of the sleek aircraft.
Last edited by Invader26 on Mon Apr 07, 2014 4:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Re: P-63 with Vee tail

Mon Apr 07, 2014 11:49 am

Invader26 wrote:The P-63 was fitted with a laminar flow wing.
Basically heavy and underpowered...


That may not have been the point.
Basically a flying wind tunnel model.

Re: P-63 with Vee tail

Mon Apr 07, 2014 12:41 pm

BF-109 in question

Image

Re: P-63 with Vee tail

Tue Apr 08, 2014 9:49 pm

Scott,I just sent an e-mail to your old gmail adress. I have no idea if it's still active,but it was worth a try. I copied the pertinent pages from Birch Matthews book on Bell fixed wing aircraft "Cobra" and attached the pdf file to the e-mail. If this won't work,give me another adress to use and I'll try again.

Larry Kraus
Post a reply