This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:26 am
Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:39 am
I like them. It's interesting to see them testing modifications full-scale in the tunnel versus on scale models and how much work goes into doing it.
Doing something like that today is nearly impossible due to cost.
Fri Jan 31, 2014 11:10 am
Tests like this allowed them to compare wind tunnel models to the full sized aircraft, thus validating that the models were sufficient by themselves to determine performance and stability. It also allowed them to validate the mathematical correction factors they were using.
Fri Jan 31, 2014 1:48 pm
Awesome stuff!
Fri Jan 31, 2014 1:54 pm
sdennison wrote:Awesome stuff!
Thx, there's a lot more wind tunnel test "Awesome-ness" to post of just about every type of WW2 airplane. Some really amazing detail. I'll post some P-38, P-40 and P-47 photos after the main page clears of my other threads. Gettings a bit busy even for me
Don't want to burn you guys out now ....
Fri Jan 31, 2014 2:49 pm
Leave 'em wanting more, Eh Mark?
Well..........
We want more!!
Some really great stuff. I agree with CAPflyer, that this could not be done nowadays.
Thanks man!
Andy
Fri Jan 31, 2014 4:27 pm
I'm puzzled as to why the entire airplane is wrapped up like a birthday present with every seam taped or faired yet the 5 gallon bucket of a tailwheel opening is left wide open
Fri Jan 31, 2014 4:41 pm
I think they were testing "quick fixes" to reduce drag on the airframe. Also, that's not the tailwheel opening. That's the tailhook opening and I don't think enclosing that is a "quick fix".
Fri Jan 31, 2014 6:00 pm
Perhaps the Langley Research Center kept their F4U-1D from the photos I posted in this thread? I'll have to check the BuNo. Kind of cool if this is the case.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.