This forum is for discussions pertaining to Air Racing and Aerobatics of NON-Warbird aircraft. In addition this is the place to discuss General Aviation aircraft topics and yes Michael, that includes flying Lawnmowers

Sat Sep 21, 2013 3:24 pm
Congrats! I just started as well. I've got 2 hours ground school and 2 hours flight time but its a start. So much money
Sat Sep 21, 2013 3:25 pm
Next week will get me up to 3 hours and I have to get my books in
Sat Sep 21, 2013 7:01 pm
whistlingdeathcorsairs wrote:Next week will get me up to 3 hours and I have to get my books in
Great!! Way to go!!
Sat Sep 21, 2013 9:25 pm
Long way to go
Sat Sep 21, 2013 10:14 pm
whistlingdeathcorsairs wrote:Long way to go
Trust me, it'll go by fast! Around ~10hrs. or so, you will get that pilot sense/instinct kicking in. Makes everything much easier!
Sun Sep 22, 2013 6:07 am
Sounding great Austin!
Soon you'll even forget how to spell C-172

never mind make comparisons to it!
Once I started flying tailwheel I decided that I never need to fly a trike again

.
What are the FAA requirements for tailwheel?
In Canada you don't need an endorsement. Usually the limiting factor is the insurers requirements. Legally, someone with a tailwheel airplane could do their ab initio training in it. (I think it would make for better pilots)
Keep having fun!
Andy
Tue Sep 24, 2013 11:14 am
DH82EH wrote:Sounding great Austin!
Soon you'll even forget how to spell C-172

never mind make comparisons to it!
Once I started flying tailwheel I decided that I never need to fly a trike again

.
What are the FAA requirements for tailwheel?
In Canada you don't need an endorsement. Usually the limiting factor is the insurers requirements. Legally, someone with a tailwheel airplane could do their ab initio training in it. (I think it would make for better pilots)
Keep having fun!
Andy
No worries, the 172 is but a distant memory now! HAHA. I really do like tailwheel better.
Here is the states, the FAA likes 10hrs w/ minimum of 100 takeoffs/landings before CFI sign-off. I don't ***think*** this is a rule, but rather a suggestion. Could be wrong, though. The whole goal of the FAA is to have the pilot signed off when they are competent, which could be either 5 or 50 hours...lol.
I'm loving this!
Tue Sep 24, 2013 2:34 pm
Hey Austin, great reading your updates!
Tue Sep 24, 2013 3:09 pm
Thomas_Mac wrote:Hey Austin, great reading your updates!
Thanks a million! Love to post them and discuss flight with others.
Tue Sep 24, 2013 11:18 pm
Here is the mighty FAR 61.31(i):
(i) Additional training required for operating tailwheel airplanes. (1) Except as provided in paragraph (i)(2) of this section, no person may act as pilot in command of a tailwheel airplane unless that person has received and logged flight training from an authorized instructor in a tailwheel airplane and received an endorsement in the person's logbook from an authorized instructor who found the person proficient in the operation of a tailwheel airplane. The flight training must include at least the following maneuvers and procedures:
(i) Normal and crosswind takeoffs and landings;
(ii) Wheel landings (unless the manufacturer has recommended against such landings); and
(iii) Go-around procedures.
(2) The training and endorsement required by paragraph (i)(1) of this section is not required if the person logged pilot-in-command time in a tailwheel airplane before April 15, 1991
Wed Sep 25, 2013 7:08 pm
airknocker wrote:Here is the mighty FAR 61.31(i):
(i) Additional training required for operating tailwheel airplanes. (1) Except as provided in paragraph (i)(2) of this section, no person may act as pilot in command of a tailwheel airplane unless that person has received and logged flight training from an authorized instructor in a tailwheel airplane and received an endorsement in the person's logbook from an authorized instructor who found the person proficient in the operation of a tailwheel airplane. The flight training must include at least the following maneuvers and procedures:
(i) Normal and crosswind takeoffs and landings;
(ii) Wheel landings (unless the manufacturer has recommended against such landings); and
(iii) Go-around procedures.
(2) The training and endorsement required by paragraph (i)(1) of this section is not required if the person logged pilot-in-command time in a tailwheel airplane before April 15, 1991
Bing bing! Thanks!
Sun Sep 29, 2013 10:55 am
Well, 3 hours ground school and 3 hours flight logged. The 172 is my best friend right now....actually, my only friend!
Sun Sep 29, 2013 6:11 pm
whistlingdeathcorsairs wrote:Well, 3 hours ground school and 3 hours flight logged. The 172 is my best friend right now....actually, my only friend!
LOL, sometimes, the Cessna can be a foe as well.
Sun Sep 29, 2013 6:23 pm
Personally, I love a low wing better like a Cherokee. I've got some time in that and to me everything seems smoother. I have to train on a high wing,( that's what he has,) and I'm constantly trimming the darn thing
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.