Two quick questions:
1- The blue formation lights appears to have a beveled lens just like those on the C-130. We went through a big hullabaloo some time back because the maintenance TO did not call for the bevel to be oriented aft (to make the plane most visible to a wingman flying in trail). Not like you guys are likely to have a wingman after hours either, but just curious if you guys oriented all your lenses "aftward"?
2- I'm equally bummed about the K4 attitude situation. The look of your instrument had me digging out my T.O. 1T-37B-1 which shows the primary attitude in the Tweet as a ARU-44/A and dang if I could not find the nomenclature on the left side reduced-size AI in the UH-1H Huey ... but my point is that there may be a military AI out there that isn't 100% B-26K but would be awfully close in appearance, would fit the panel, and would be safe for flight. Given the number of T-37s that hit AMARC after 2009, there's got to be some stock on those units. Anything military would look a lot better than anything vacuum.
In case you don't have it, I found this extensive listing of military instrument numbers:
http://www.designation-systems.net/usmi ... s/u-a.htmlAlso, is there any chance that your K-4 was renamed ARU-4/A?? Does that change anything?
http://fsg-66-instruments.parttarget.co ... -54-A.htmlKen