This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:11 pm
Hypothetically speaking....
If you wanted to start a new-build production line of..... oh lets say SB2U Vindicators.....
A. Are Pratt & Whitney R-1535 Twin Wasp Junior engines rare?
B. And if so what engine would you use to supplement it?
Fri Mar 29, 2013 7:23 pm
Nearly unobtanium I think. Might be easier to find a DB-601.
The Hughes racer had an R-1535.
Fri Mar 29, 2013 8:29 pm
Jim told me years ago that the only two 1535's in existence were in the two racers.
Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:57 pm
That's not true. POF had one, unless they sold it on.
Fri Mar 29, 2013 11:35 pm
What happend to them all I mean they cant all have been scrapped.
Sat Mar 30, 2013 7:02 am
As for a substitute, the similar Wright R-1510 would be an obvious choice, if you could find one . . . which is probably even more difficult.
Sat Mar 30, 2013 10:01 am
According to Graham White's Allied Aircraft Piston Engines of World War II, only 2880 R-1535s were built between 1931 and the end of production in 1941. With only 750 h.p. it just wasn't powerful enough for combat aircraft by then. Just FYI.
Randy
Sat Mar 30, 2013 10:23 am
An 1830 is within a couple inches of the correct diameter and horsepower can be regulated by adjusting the throttle rigging. I'd wager the Boeing 247A was the probably the biggest user followed by the F2F and 'Windindicator'
Sun Mar 31, 2013 6:03 pm
I believe there was an 850 HP version of the R-1535.
The small diameter didn't buy much in terms of trade-offs - higher complexity and weight compared to existing nine-cylinder engines, which also had more power.
Makes one wonder what the engine planners were thinking....
Mon Apr 01, 2013 4:27 pm
daviemax wrote:I believe there was an 850 HP version of the R-1535.
The small diameter didn't buy much in terms of trade-offs - higher complexity and weight compared to existing nine-cylinder engines, which also had more power.
Makes one wonder what the engine planners were thinking....
It was the JT-9D of 1933 all technical and cutting edge.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.