Noha307 wrote:
Well, whoops. Looks like I was wrong.

I still appreciate his response though.
But don't let that stop anyone, this is a heck'ov'a interesting thread.
Let me try a another question, how would anyone feel if, hypothetically, TIGHAR split itself into two separate groups - one for pursuit of the Amelia stuff and another for the pursuit of other historic aircraft. Would you be willing to support either or neither of those? (Presumably, the latter group would have the time and means to actually go after and recover aircraft.) I'm trying to get as much as I can to the heart of the issue. I apologize if it seems redundant.
I think with this question, actions would have to speak louder than words in both divisions. It's easy to talk about recovery expeditions, putting that talk into action is a whole different story. With many other established organizations essentially doing the same thing, though, I'd rather put my money with a group that has shown tangible results.
In the area of historic ships, for example, we've seen other groups come out and "talk the talk" end up with disastrous results. The group that brought the Cabot back from Spain, or the group that tried to bring the John Rodgers back from Mexico are two that come to mind. Unfortunately, neither could "walk the walk" and both ships are gone. These groups, like TIGHAR, were headline grabbers that ultimately couldn't back their hype. This hurt other legitimate groups chances saving these ships. Both ended up victims of the cutting torch. Luckily, TIGHAR hasn't "lost" any airplanes.