Tue Jul 24, 2012 3:11 pm
Tue Jul 24, 2012 3:19 pm
Tue Jul 24, 2012 3:23 pm
Boeing666 wrote:I'd be willing to travel a few miles to watch these at an airshow.
Tue Jul 24, 2012 3:33 pm
Tue Jul 24, 2012 3:36 pm
Tue Jul 24, 2012 5:40 pm
Boeing666 wrote:I'd be willing to travel a few miles to watch these at an airshow.
Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:28 pm
Tue Jul 24, 2012 9:50 pm
Boeing666 wrote:I'm really surprised that Wright Patterson AFM didn't try to get an older model from Russia to put in their Cold War hangar. This plane I think is the definition of Russia's part in the Cold War. This was the plane that Americans feared back in the 1950s/60s. This was the plane you would see pictures of sneaking into American territory being escorted by an F-4 or an A-7. I would think that Russia especially after the Cold War ended would have tried selling some for relatively cheap and the AFM could have picked one up. Wright Patt unfortunately has a lack of Soviet equipment in their cold war museum - Mig-15 (in Korean War hangar), Mig-17, Mig-19, Mig-21, I believe there is a Mig-23 and Mig-25 in storage or restoration, and last time I was there they did have a Mig-29 on display.
Wed Jul 25, 2012 2:39 am
Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:00 am
jwc50 wrote:...any more than the U.S. would or could sell a B-52 to the Russians or someone else for a msueum.
jwc50 wrote:In any case they are unique airplanes and I would love to see and hear one flying. Seeing one as a static museum piece doesn't interest me nearly as much.
Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:29 am
Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:31 am
TROJANII wrote:"Commenting on whether the Tu-95MS, manufactured in the 1980s, were obsolete, Zhikharev said the U.S. B-52 bomber started being produced in the 1950s and "the Americans believe that they will remain in service for another 30 years."
I wonder when was the last time the Bear was updated, if ever?
Notice the condition of the tarmac in the photo of the Bear?
Wed Jul 25, 2012 12:30 pm
Dave Smith wrote:A friend of mine who has seen both types flying, says that the Bear is the nearest he has ever heard to the unique sound of a B-36.
Wed Jul 25, 2012 2:15 pm
jwc50 wrote:Dave Smith wrote:A friend of mine who has seen both types flying, says that the Bear is the nearest he has ever heard to the unique sound of a B-36.
Those contra-rotating turboprops do make a very unique sound. The big AN-22 transport with the contra-rotating props makes a similar sound that I have seen on videos.
I would love to see and hear one of these unique airplanes in person!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9S3h37G ... re=related
Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:02 pm
jwc50 wrote:Dave Smith wrote:A friend of mine who has seen both types flying, says that the Bear is the nearest he has ever heard to the unique sound of a B-36.
Really? B-36 was piston, a turboprop bear sounds like a piston engine?Cking wrote:Don't get me started on the AN-22!!!
I was on holiday in Vero Beach when I noticed that my camera charger wasn't working. No problem it was the end of the holiday and I had recorded all the important Florida bits.
On my first day back at work at Manchester Airport what should be sitting on the ramp over by the cargo sheds??? The AN-22. Did I mention that my camera was INOP?
The day was photographicaly perfect. Bright sunshine high fluffy white clouds and the aircraft was parked nose into sun. Did I mention that my camera was INOP?
I went out to have a look at the aircraft and there was no ground equipment around it. Did I mention that my camera was INOP? I had a good look around it, it was beutiful.
Now things get worse! It was due to leave the next day, guess who was on leave the next day to look after the kids??? Go on, have a guess. I'll give you a clue, His camera was INOP!!!!!!
The next day one of my workmates did phone me and tell me it was about to leave and it did sound fantastic but it did not fly over my house, every thing else does but not the AN-22!
So I must be unique on WIX. I've seen both types but missed both types flying.
I'M NOT BITTER!!!!!!!!!!
Rgds Cking