Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Mon Aug 25, 2025 2:11 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 259 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 18  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 7:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 26, 2012 10:27 pm
Posts: 491
Location: Orlando FL
the Texan II was originally on the site but disappeared in the more recent update. Just one of each modern? usually Texan IIs come in pairs or more


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2012 8:51 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 554
Location: LONDON, ONTARIO, CANADA
All,

Additional static military aircraft will be added in the next few days.

Cheers,

Tom Walsh.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2012 5:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 26, 2012 10:27 pm
Posts: 491
Location: Orlando FL
I always love the static military aircraft for arrivals day especially if it is a big one - like last year with the P-3s, and year before I missed the KC-135 and KC-10 arrival - I was at the ATM on Michigan Ave and Belleville Rd when the KC-10 flew over


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2012 6:58 pm 
TOM WALSH wrote:
All,

Additional static military aircraft will be added in the next few days.

Cheers,

Tom Walsh.



Hope there will be some "interesting" ones to see come in on Taxiway Photography/Arrival Day on August 3!


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 2:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 26, 2012 10:27 pm
Posts: 491
Location: Orlando FL
Maybe the V-22s will show up again. Like to see a couple of the big ones come in but something that hasn't been here before like an E-3 with the old JTD3 engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 3:34 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 1:08 pm
Posts: 2993
Location: Bunker Hill, WV
Boeing666 wrote:
Maybe the V-22s will show up again. Like to see a couple of the big ones come in but something that hasn't been here before like an E-3 with the old JTD3 engines.


What are V-22s and E-3s?

Mudge the uneducated

_________________
Land of the free because of the brave


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 3:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 26, 2012 10:27 pm
Posts: 491
Location: Orlando FL
Something Mudge wouldn't like because they are modern, but they had V-22s last year.

V-22 Osprey

Image


E-3 Sentry

Image


We had the E-6 last year, which is the Navy version without the big dome on top and it also had the new CFM quiet engines - I like the old smokey screaming engines that the E-3 has.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 966
Location: Seattle, WA
Boeing666 wrote:
We had the E-6 last year, which is the Navy version without the big dome on top and it also had the new CFM quiet engines.


I hate to be that nit-picker-guy...but as any self-respecting Naval Aviator will tell you--regardless of their personal opinions of the bus-drivers that fly them--the E-6 is not a Navy version of an E-3 Sentry/AWACS. The E-6 Mercury/Hermes is a TACAMO aircraft--designed to communicate with Navy ballistic missile subs using long VLF radio antennaes reeled out for miles behind the plane. Other versions have been adapted to take on the old Air Force "Looking Glass" program.

But it's not an E-3 without the dome and better engines.

Just sayin. 8)

_________________
Offer me solutions, offer me alternatives, and I decline......


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 5:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 26, 2012 10:27 pm
Posts: 491
Location: Orlando FL
Speedy wrote:
I hate to be that nit-picker-guy...but as any self-respecting Naval Aviator will tell you--regardless of their personal opinions of the bus-drivers that fly them--the E-6 is not a Navy version of an E-3 Sentry/AWACS. The E-6 Mercury/Hermes is a TACAMO aircraft--designed to communicate with Navy ballistic missile subs using long VLF radio antennaes reeled out for miles behind the plane. Other versions have been adapted to take on the old Air Force "Looking Glass" program.

But it's not an E-3 without the dome and better engines.


I could be a commercial aviation snob and say that both are military versions of the Boeing 707 :twisted:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 10:22 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 1:08 pm
Posts: 2993
Location: Bunker Hill, WV
Boeing666 wrote:
Something Mudge wouldn't like because they are modern, but they had V-22s last year.


Wrong...Mudge likes modern. I just don't care for the noise and smell of the kerosene burners. They just don't have, for me, the "character" that the WWII types do.

Mudge the geezer

_________________
Land of the free because of the brave


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 8:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 26, 2012 10:27 pm
Posts: 491
Location: Orlando FL
Mudge wrote:
Boeing666 wrote:
Something Mudge wouldn't like because they are modern, but they had V-22s last year.


Wrong...Mudge likes modern. I just don't care for the noise and smell of the kerosene burners. They just don't have, for me, the "character" that the WWII types do.

Mudge the geezer


You wouldn't smell or hear them on Saturday because they would be on static. I agree with the Mudge on character though. However the V-22 has its own unique sound that seperates it from any helicopter or plane. The E-3 with the old smokey engines has more character than the E-6 that came last year with the modern CFM engines (sounded like a 737 with 4 engines), while the E-3 has that high pitched shreik similar to that of the B-52.

Diamond Lil is flying again after the landing mishap at CLT. It often tours with Fifi, any chance that Diamond Lil will make a last minute appearance at Thunder? I would love to get pictures of it with the Diamond Lil colors since it was still Ol 927 when it was last here - just wish it would go back to those desert pinkish colors it used to have as Diamond Lil.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 10:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 8:41 pm
Posts: 259
Location: Central Illinois
Mudge wrote:
I just don't care for the noise and smell of the kerosene burners. They just don't have, for me, the "character" that the WWII types do.
Mudge the geezer


The young pups just don't understand us geezers

_________________
Steve Turner, USAF aircraft refueler 54+ years ago.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 5:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 26, 2012 10:27 pm
Posts: 491
Location: Orlando FL
I like it all, but it is always nice to see something new that never been there before.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 5:54 pm 
Boeing666 wrote:
Mudge wrote:
Boeing666 wrote:
Something Mudge wouldn't like because they are modern, but they had V-22s last year.


Wrong...Mudge likes modern. I just don't care for the noise and smell of the kerosene burners. They just don't have, for me, the "character" that the WWII types do.

Mudge the geezer


You wouldn't smell or hear them on Saturday because they would be on static. I agree with the Mudge on character though. However the V-22 has its own unique sound that seperates it from any helicopter or plane. The E-3 with the old smokey engines has more character than the E-6 that came last year with the modern CFM engines (sounded like a 737 with 4 engines), while the E-3 has that high pitched shreik similar to that of the B-52.

Diamond Lil is flying again after the landing mishap at CLT. It often tours with Fifi, any chance that Diamond Lil will make a last minute appearance at Thunder? I would love to get pictures of it with the Diamond Lil colors since it was still Ol 927 when it was last here - just wish it would go back to those desert pinkish colors it used to have as Diamond Lil.


I like some of the older jet engines too. But I would hardly say that the turbofan engines on the E-3 are the "old smoky engines." The old smoky engines are really the turbojet engines that preceeded the turbofans. Like the KC-135A's when they had the old J-57 turbojets and the B-52G's and earlier models with the J-57 engines. Yes the turbofans on KC-135E's, USAF E-3's and B-52H's may put out some visible smoke compared to more modern high bypass engines, but nothing like the old turbojets. But the smaller older Turbofans definitely have a different sound then the big high bypass engines that replaced them.

Agree. it would be outstanding to see a B-24 as a last minute addition to Thunder.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 6:03 pm 
Boeing666 wrote:
I like it all, but it is always nice to see something new that never been there before.


I like it all too. But WWII prop, Post-WWII prop (like C-97, C-123, Skyraider, etc.), and 1950's/1960's era vintage jets are my favorites.

I would not mind seeing some unique current military aircraft that do not frequent Thunder come in on Taxiway Photography/Arrival Day to get some great aerial views and photography on approach.


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 259 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 18  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bradburger, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], OD/NG and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group