Sun Jun 17, 2012 11:18 pm



Sun Jun 17, 2012 11:34 pm
dbrown wrote:She was giving rides this week and left today. After I looked over the shots I noticed the placement of the star and bar under the wing (too small and too far aft?).
I'll take the sound of 4 radials any day.![]()
Mon Jun 18, 2012 1:41 am
Mon Jun 18, 2012 5:56 pm
Mon Jun 18, 2012 7:08 pm
Mon Jun 18, 2012 7:25 pm
Xrayist wrote:It sure didn't take long for the "inaccurate paint scheme patrol, and tramp stamp haters" to sound off on this one. At least some comment could have been made about how magnificent the plane is, or how much you appreciate the time and effort needed to maintain and fly such a plane, but alas, it was not to be.
So, as I have said before, why don't you all whip out the old credit cards or checkbooks and offer to pay for a repaint of the plane so that it meets your approval, and while your at it add several more zeroes to cover the cost of any funding they get because of the "tramp stamp". I am sure that the EAA would gladly take a free paint job that probably costs more than my house did. Let us know what scheme you guys decide on so as to give adequate notice to all those other nitpickers so they can get a head start on studying the new scheme so they can complain about it ASAP!

Tue Jun 19, 2012 10:07 pm
Wed Jun 20, 2012 6:57 pm
hang the expense wrote:I dont like tramps stamps on women and I sure as heck dont like them on warbirds.At least its easily removable... on the airplane.And while I'm ranting the need to fix the stars and bars.