Thu Nov 03, 2011 9:11 am
Thu Nov 03, 2011 10:35 am
marine air wrote:As a taxpayer. I would like to see it retained, as a parts bird , if nothing else. Haven't there been aircraft. like the SKyraider that were withdrawn from combat because they ran out of spare parts?
Reminds me also of the A-10. One day they will be withdrawing the A-10, B-52H etc. not because of obsolescence but because they ran out of airframes, etc.
Fri Nov 04, 2011 6:13 am
gary1954 wrote:RickH wrote:Moving it is also cost prohibitive
I have nothing against the AF, In fact I kinda dig their job. but cost?? Pa-leasseee...
Thats about bogus...Lets see, the airmen and experianced NCOs get paid already, they are tasked to do a job...cost for contracting the "hired Help"? ummmm zero.
Cost of Equipment necessary to move the buff? ummmm I would imagine zero as well since they pretty much have everything they need in inventory to recover a bomber....
I would suspect an attempt to be politically correct, instead of just coming out and saying "we don't wanna maintain a grounded aircraft anymore so we're scrapping the b i t c h."
Fri Nov 04, 2011 7:43 am