kalamazookid wrote:
ChrisDNT wrote:
What is great with the British warbirds is that they are always painted with the right colors, without overchroming or "fun" markings like sharkmouth, modern pinups or personal things.
I could not agree more. You won't see a Spitfire in the UK restored with the hideous nose art seen on most of the Tigercats in the US, for example. I have a lot of respect for the people who restore aircraft like this Spitfire to a stock appearance and honor its history. Beautiful (and very historic) aircraft.
One thing about I learned about the UK registered warbirds from what paperwork came with SM969-
They have to ask permission from the RAF or MOD to paint in RAF colors and schemes.
The paperwork gets submitted with drawings and specs before paint.
After approval then this info is also forwarded to the CAA and is included with that paperwork as well. It also has something to do with being able to be flown with out the National Registration being painted on the exterior in some cases.
If this is indeed the process I assume to get RAF approval you probably need to fairly accurate on paint colors and markings. Obviously the Spitfire I is above the top accurate and detailed beyond what is required but there seems to be a degree of dealing with rules and regulations involved over there in how you paint.
In the US none of this is needed to paint an aircraft. The owner gets to do as they wish. Only rules pertain to how the N number is applied and a N can't be apart of some types of markings. In the case of a Spit XIV that the CAF has now in Calif, when 1st assembled here for David Price they couldn't display the serial number since it had an N in it. NHXXX or HNXXX. The N had to be painted out in that serial number on the side of the fus. That was back in the 80s.