Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 11:41 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat May 07, 2011 3:38 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 3:11 am
Posts: 837
Great 360 degree photo and map of the USAFM at Dayton - http://www.nmusafvirtualtour.com/full/tour-pkg.html

Pity the whole collection couldnt fly... but better than been scrapped - they are least they are preserved for future...

Phil


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 07, 2011 4:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 8:43 am
Posts: 441
Location: Graham, Tx
now that is cool! thanks for the link. almost like being there


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 07, 2011 4:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 4:43 am
Posts: 2
Static preservation is not a poor alternative to airworthy operation.

Good thing they're not flying. Saves them from modern modifications, wear and tear and possible crashes. There are enough flyers.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 07, 2011 7:28 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5664
Location: Minnesota, USA
Flightgearguy wrote:
...There are enough flyers.



SACRILEGE! :axe:

(and that coming from a guy building a static! :wink: )

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 07, 2011 9:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:51 pm
Posts: 448
Location: NW Florida
WOW! Now that is incredible. Way to go NMoUSAF, hope some of my money went toward that project. What a great service, not only do we have a fantastic public museum with arguably the worlds greatest collection of aircraft, people who are unable to go see it can come very very close to experiencing it on the internet.

All on this forum who are part of or members of the Museum should be proud of themselves.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 07, 2011 9:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 10:39 am
Posts: 632
Location: "Jersey Guy" living in Ohio
they did a great job .. and I have the privilege of spending time there every Friday ...

Yesteday, we had close to 1,000 youngsters for Space Day ... there was a presentation by one of the Astranouts and then they were touring the museum as well ...

just wait till the SEA (Vietnam) gallery is finished ... they recently added some "Misty" exhibits as well as the "River Rats" who will be having their reunion this coming week.

_________________
Jerry
S/Sgt. - USAF Radio Operator '52-'56
C-119 "Flying Boxcar" - Korea & Japan

Volunteer: National Museum of the US Air Force (2007-2016)
LTM 381st Bomb Group Memorial Association


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 07, 2011 10:27 am 
Flightgearguy wrote:
Static preservation is not a poor alternative to airworthy operation.

Good thing they're not flying. Saves them from modern modifications, wear and tear and possible crashes. There are enough flyers.


I AGREE - static preservation is not a bad alternative to keeping in a flyable state, especially if there is only one example of a type left. But I disagree that there are enough flyers - there are a lot more post-WWII type military props and jets and civilian propliner aircraft that I would like to see as flyers.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 07, 2011 10:29 am 
Liberator wrote:
Great 360 degree photo and map of the USAFM at Dayton - http://www.nmusafvirtualtour.com/full/tour-pkg.html

Pity the whole collection couldnt fly... but better than been scrapped - they are least they are preserved for future...

Phil


The AF Museum has an outstanding collection and I look forward to my next visit there in a couple of years or so. Thanks for the link.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 07, 2011 7:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 4:43 am
Posts: 2
Dan, I meant that there are enough flyers that the museum doesn't need to fly any. Maybe a 'historic flight' using other airplanes, but it'd be irresponsible to fly any of the museum's exhibits.

So yeah, we can always have more flyers, just not from the museum ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 08, 2011 1:58 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:32 am
Posts: 4331
Location: Battle Creek, MI
Now that's cool! My only wish would be that they had shot the pictures from a higher vantage point. I would love to see the museum install some elevated catwalks like they have an Udvar-Hazy or Pensacola, but of course I realize the the expense would be prohibitive (and there are liablity and accessiblity issues involved as well.)

SN


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 33 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group