The Inspector wrote:
JDK,
I'm not so sure about that.
I am.
Unlike some, I use English precisely.

I said "Chances of remains from a crash ... extremely remote". Not impossible, but highly unlikely. To go further:
It is
certain there's not a 1932 de Havilland Dove in the lake, because the type doesn't exist.
If one of <3 examples of a very rare Sopwith Dove a wood/fabric type went into the lake in 1932 (after 12 years flying / existence) as a rotary powered type - itself highly improbable) then it would probably be severely damaged. The structure of a 1919 aircraft is wood like a ship, but otherwise has almost nothing in common; from waterproofing /resistance to size of structural members. I agree the conditions are often benign to such wooden structures and remarkably light materials - but this specific case?
Possible, but not at all likely. (I'm well aware of fresh water ship survival - boarded a couple myself after they've been returned to working order at the Windermere Steamboat Museum. ) But, again, while it's possible, how much would you
bet on it? At the very best you've got several 'one in a hundred chances', each one hundredth of the previous probability.
That's assuming the identification is in some aspect correct - as it stands, either the type or the date is wrong - given that, you'd be cautious of given weight to the rest of the identification.
So, very unlikely. It'd be interesting if the 1932 date is correct what might've happened then, and in the unlikely event of it being a Sopwith Dove ditching, I'd certainly find it interesting - but I won't be expecting to find the remains. A '1962' de Havilland Dove ditching? Much more likely, just as worthless to recover.
Of course they may have gold aboard too. All the good wreck stories have to feature that or Ame... nah.
Regards,