Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Mon May 12, 2025 4:36 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2011 10:51 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 2:43 am
Posts: 2491
Location: New Zealand
Lynn

Can't see your pics-but there are well known shots of (I think Russian front) of 109Fs in the brown -green scheme being polished to a high sheen.

Mark - Super intro to this post-I think the detail has overwhelmed most, hence little response. Your passion for this aircraft is obvious!

Dave

_________________
Classic Wings Magazine

https://www.classicwings.com/

Facebook

https://www.facebook.com/ClassicWingsMagazine/

Preserved Axis Aircraft

http://www.classicwings.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2011 11:01 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 1525
Location: Williamsburg, VA
DaveM2 wrote:
Lynn

Can't see your pics-but there are well known shots of (I think Russian front) of 109Fs in the brown -green scheme being polished to a high sheen.

Mark - Super intro to this post-I think the detail has overwhelmed most, hence little response. Your passion for this aircraft is obvious!

Dave


Yep, you're thinking of the Stab/JG 54 bird of Werner Pichon Kalau vom Hofe...

Image


Caught in the act!

Image


I'd suggest this was the exception to the rule, but perhaps Trautloft insisted on having all the Geschwaderstab aircraft polished- who knows. It's definitely eye-catching!

Lynn


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2011 11:32 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
Shepsair,

Thank you for the very thorough and well laid out presentation involving the FHC's newest. I learned a great deal about a variety of 'little' things about the airframe and it's finish with out feeling like I'd 'been to school' as some seem to think is the way to teach new things.

I really enjoyed reading about what seems to have been a passion for you, and I can't wait until it arrives here @ KPAE and is out of the high desert light to get a 'real' look @ the colors.

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 1:02 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 2760
Mark,

Thank you very much for your insights into this project. It goes without saying, but from all of us hard-core warbird fans, your hard work, time and research is much appreciated! It's sad that FHC was willing to spend almost $ 10 Million dollars on this restoration and then be cheap on the last, most visible aspect of it - the paint job. This is a very disturbing trend with a lot of restorations. Owners will go to great lengths to have everything restored exactly to factory specifications when it rolled off the assembly line, only to skimp on the paint job at the end and ruin the whole thing. I'm not saying this project is ruined -far from it! But, from what you wrote, it does not give me confidence that FHC spends as much time on researching the paint schemes as they probably should for a restoration of that caliber.

Mark, so overall, if you had to rate this paint job for accuracy and authenticity, what grade would you give it on a scale of 1 to 10?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 5:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:05 am
Posts: 271
Location: Oxfordshire
Matt, Lynn, Dave etc

Difficult to rate isn't it. How would you rate it of one colour is incorrect or four colours - it is still incorrect.

The blue underside looks fine - two RLM76's and they have used the gray blue version.

The RLM79 tan is also correct. The tailplane where they took a sample still had significant amounts of this colour. It is really the grey green which should be RLM81 and the light green should be RLM82. I do admit there may have been a section of light green overpainting the yellow theatre marking in front of the tail - but not the whole aircraft.

You then get comments that the colour is not important! Imagine if it was a UK company painting Memphis Belle and painting it their interrpretation of Olive Drab and it was a bit lime greeny.

Most of the comments are from people - just saying it looks good. That's fine it does look good but does not mean it is correct. There is only a few of us that know how she looked from seeing/dealing with this Fw190 over the last 20 years or has researched Luftwaffe colours in general.

Few more emails and the like to do. I am going to try and contact Paul Allen's (letter/email) and provide a short synopsis of my thoughts. We will see if this comes to anything.

Have a good weekend.

Mark

_________________
'Coups De Foudre'
(511FS, 405FG watering hole), St Dizier, France 1944/45


Last edited by shepsair on Sat Jan 29, 2011 11:39 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 9:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 11:58 am
Posts: 214
Location: northeastern US
Mark,
Stellar lead in post! I know diddly about Luftwaffe color codes, etc but certainly did gleen enough from your post to believe that something is potentially amiss with the green used on the aircraft. It's dredging up the same feelings as when I saw Dave Price's Hurricane camo scheme several decades ago.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 24, 2012 11:16 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 11:39 pm
Posts: 1
I'm new to this forum, so I hope I can get help and help other along the way.
I live in Seattle so I get to see the FHC FW190 regularly.
I'm in the process of building an RC FW 190 and I'm half way through painting it to look like the FHC one. I was bothered by the paint scheme which didn't fit what I could find on Russian front airplanes. I put it down to the researchers working for FHC knowing more than I did.
Then I came across this thread which re-opened my questions. There is a comment in the beginning of this thread on a four view drawing of this plane with a better idea of the colors and layout of the camouflage which is thought to be more authentic.
Is this four view available? if so How can I get a copy so I can feel that my RC model is correctly painted?

Thanks in advance,

Ivor


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 311 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group