That's a great shot Frank, but I think I would Photoshop out the MiG kills and backdate the USAF national insignia, since I'm assuming the flight gear was not the same in Korea as it was in WWII.
The key is it is re-enACTING. Do those that think it's silly ever go to see a play or a movie? Watch TV? History is far more interesting to people who only have a casual interest when they can see it in a tangible form. Seeing someone in period clothing next to an aircraft really allows one to begin to "connect the dots", IMO.
When I did it, it was a combination of playing "dress up" and sharing the history. I did it because I love (obsessed according to the wife) WWII aviation history. I was new to reenacting, so I didn't know a whole lot about the correct gear for early war, late war, etc. My friends took care of that for me. The photos we took though will always be special to me. Will I do it again? I'd like to, but who knows. If I do, it will probably be more for ground crew type photos while painting nose art.
Overall though, I think it really ads to an airshow environment, but as has been stated, you have to do it right. With that said, I would not expect anyone who is interested in doing it to drop $3000 right from the start, and you have to start somewhere. Luckily for me, I have friends who have amassed pretty good collections. When we did Thunder Over Michigan in '05, when we assembled at the Movie Belle, the photographers were literally running across the tarmac to take some pics.
Is going to a hangar dance in uniform playing dress up, reenacting, or both? Swing dancing is fun. Swing dancing in Class A's in front of a bomber is really fun. Anymore though when we go, I just dress in '40s civies, because I don't want to shave to wear the uniform. And as has been stated, it's important to respect the uniform.
Here's a couple pics. I'm sure there are all kinds of errors, but I had to borrow it all as everything I own is Class A related.




Disregard the late war B-17 in the background...

