Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue Jul 08, 2025 5:30 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 5:38 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
i think all that have posted thus far are right regarding certain aspects to the topic. i also feel the topic will never be nailed down solid.

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 5:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 4:42 pm
Posts: 441
tom d. friedman wrote:
i think all that have posted thus far are right regarding certain aspects to the topic. i also feel the topic will never be nailed down solid.


but hunting is fun!

;)

_________________
rreis

If you want pictures, see rreis@flickr


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 8:39 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9720
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
When I saw the turbo C-47 we were actually in the airpark taking pics. We were guests there and were told we can take pics of the static aircraft but nothing else. We thought that it was pretty cool of them to let us do that and did want to be disrespectful and try sneaking pics of flying aircraft. We did see a turbo C-47 which was painted different than the one in that picture, a 4 bladed Huey, and an AC-130. Pretty cool stuff. There is actually a parking area near the base where you pull off and at night see the AC-130's having target practice. You are miles away, but still cool to watch.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 11:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 2:24 pm
Posts: 819
Location: San Angelo, Texas
Almost forgot - the RAF BBMF is still operating a C-47, and it seems it has been in military service since it was built
(USAAF - RCAF - RAE/RAF). More on this at:
http://www.raf.mod.uk/bbmf/theaircraft/dakota.cfm

_________________
Bob


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 11:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 4:42 pm
Posts: 441
Old SAR pilot wrote:
Almost forgot - the RAF BBMF is still operating a C-47, and it seems it has been in military service since it was built
(USAAF - RCAF - RAE/RAF). More on this at:
http://www.raf.mod.uk/bbmf/theaircraft/dakota.cfm


I was aware of something of the sort... but can it still be considered active military service? I can see myself answering yes and no at the same time...

_________________
rreis

If you want pictures, see rreis@flickr


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 2:24 pm
Posts: 819
Location: San Angelo, Texas
From the above website:
Quote:
She continues to be capable of para-dropping and is used in that role for special commemorative events. During 2004, original and authentic ‘para-seats’ were re-fitted to the Dakota, returning the cabin interior to the original, wartime specification. In 2007 clearance was gained to drop the RAF freefall parachute display team, ‘The Falcons’, and in 2008 clearance was gained to use the latest military static line parachute, thus enabling BBMF to drop the current generation of paratroopers.


That count? :wink:

_________________
Bob


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 4:42 pm
Posts: 441
Old SAR pilot wrote:
From the above website:
Quote:
She continues to be capable of para-dropping and is used in that role for special commemorative events. During 2004, original and authentic ‘para-seats’ were re-fitted to the Dakota, returning the cabin interior to the original, wartime specification. In 2007 clearance was gained to drop the RAF freefall parachute display team, ‘The Falcons’, and in 2008 clearance was gained to use the latest military static line parachute, thus enabling BBMF to drop the current generation of paratroopers.


That count? :wink:


I would say yes but not because of that. I would say yes if the BBMF is a full military operation with military purposed. Because even the military have marketing and you can do your military service doing it. What I mean is that it has a military mission and that is what would count in my book. :)

Now, the motive for me to say no would be it is not front line active service (combat or combat support)... but I figure has long everyone knows what they are talking about and the proper context it is OK.

:) nive you remembered that one.

_________________
rreis

If you want pictures, see rreis@flickr


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 39 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group