Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 10:31 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 78 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Should the Grissom B-17 be converted to an F
Yes, being that much of the G hardware is fake, backdate it to F 43%  43%  [ 28 ]
No, it is a G model, make it looke like a G model 55%  55%  [ 36 ]
No, leave it as a G model, but paint it as the F model 2%  2%  [ 1 ]
Total votes : 65
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 3:25 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9720
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
I started this as I want to see what kind of results we get back. I was approached by the museum board who wish to backdate the G model to F standards to portray it as Old Bill from the 305th BombGroup. This aircraft is the one shot up at the end of the memphis Belle docu. It suffered heavy losses and only two members of the crew were uninjured. The plane is pretty well empty inside and much of the hardware to make it look like a G is fiberglass replica items. What are your thoughts. I want to get some feedback for the museum.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 3:32 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 7:26 pm
Posts: 4969
Location: PA
Hi Chris,

This is an interesting project. But I have to be honest and say keep it as a "G" model. IMHO. The aircraft might be in rough shape but that does not mean you can't get the markings and paint correct.

_________________
Shop the Airplane Bunker At
www.warbirdbunker.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 3:35 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9720
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
Nathan no worries. It is not my idea, but an idea that was brought up. I don't mind what the results are, I just am trying to help gather data for the museum. It loosk like we now have a place to move it indoors!

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 3:46 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:54 am
Posts: 5210
Location: Stratford, CT.
Seeing as how we have more G's compared to F's I think it would be kind of cool to see another backdated G. Personally i think this version of the B-17 is under-represented and would be good considering the amount of combat it saw. Tallichet's B-17 to me looks just like an F. In fact, I kind of wish a couple flyable G's were posing as F's as well. So many scheme possibilities with that version!

_________________
Keep Em' Flying,
Christopher Soltis

Dedicated to the preservation and education of The Sikorsky Memorial Airport

CASC Blog Page: http://ctair-space.blogspot.com/
Warbird Wear: https://www.redbubble.com/people/warbirdwear/shop

Chicks Dig Warbirds.......right?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 3:51 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 7:49 pm
Posts: 2164
Location: West Lafayette, Ind.
I'd personally rather see it stay a -G model. There are plenty of worthy -G paint schemes that would make a nice tribute too. A backdate to an -F would be cool, but I'd rather see it preserved as the model it was built. Just because there are more -G's around doesn't mean they're any less appreciated.

Keep up the good work Chris. I think it's great what you're doing to get the aircraft restored and eventually indoors. I wish there were more people who would dedicate themselves to local outdoor display aircraft.

_________________
Matt


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 3:55 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 7:49 pm
Posts: 2164
Location: West Lafayette, Ind.
As an addendum to my previous post, I think concentrating on getting original -G parts to replace the fiberglass and replica parts to restore the aircraft correctly would be a good goal to shoot for. I think doing whatever can be done with regards to fitting it out with original -G parts would be a more special display than backdating it.

_________________
Matt


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 4:08 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9720
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
I am just honored to help out with the plane. The board pretty is running the show with us just adding our two cents where we can. So I remain sort of out of it, just waiting to hear what direction to go. Either way the plane's condition is going to improve.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 4:22 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 2760
Personally, I wish they would backdate it to a B-23. Oh wait a minute, that plane is ugly and not worthy of collecting or representing. Nevermind. :D


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 4:28 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 7:26 pm
Posts: 4969
Location: PA
warbird1 wrote:
Personally, I wish they would backdate it to a B-23. Oh wait a minute, that plane is ugly and not worthy of collecting or representing. Nevermind. :D


LMFAO!!! :mrgreen:

Now that there is funny! :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
Shop the Airplane Bunker At
www.warbirdbunker.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: doesn't much matter...
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 5:02 pm
Posts: 786
Location: US
...if it doesn't fly do what ever. personally I'd love to see a YB -40 as that was an oddball plane that not very many folks even know about.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:53 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:49 am
Posts: 1635
Location: Belgium
Make it an F :)

_________________
Magister Aviation
It's all in my book

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 6:01 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9720
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
jet1 wrote:
...if it doesn't fly do what ever


And that is what is awesome to hear after working on a plane for a few hours in the heat.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 6:20 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
You could build it as a late B-17F-VE or DL or, an SB-17 with a boat

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:41 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:32 am
Posts: 4331
Location: Battle Creek, MI
Normally I'm a stickler for historically accurate restorations, but in this case I think it would be cool to see her backdated. Like you say Chris, she's in rough shape and pretty well gutted right now. That particular airframe doesn't really have much history as a G, and the F is rather underrepresented.

Of course, I'm assuming that snince "Old Bill" was a contemporary of the Belle that would make it an early F. You would not only have to remove the chin turret, you'd also need to reconfigure the cheek windows (they were the "flat" style, and the guns were mounted in "mirror image" compared to the G,) remove the navigator's astrodome (and add the extra windows over the nose) and get an early-style tail gun position. To be totally accurate, you'd also need to change the waist positions to the open configuation with sliding windows. As a late G, I assume she's got staggered waist windows, so one one have to be repositioned. Sounds like quite a job, but if you've got to do a bunch of work on her anyway, why not?

SN


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:21 pm
Posts: 117
It's a G, leave it as a G.

If they want an F, why not make a fiberglass replica instead?

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 78 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 268 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group